On the impatience implications of Paretian social welfare functions

Journal of Mathematical Economics

Volumn 43, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 236-248

  Banerjee, Kuntal ^a   Mitra, Tapan ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Generic impatience; Impatience condition; Pareto axiom; Social welfare function

Indexed keywords

EID: 34047261114     PISSN: 03044068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2006.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Anderson R., and Zame R.W. Genericity with infinitely many parameters. Advances in Theoretical Economics 1 (2000) 1-62
2. Basu K., and Mitra T. Aggregating infinite utility streams with inter-generational equity: the impossibility of being Paretian. Econometrica 71 (2003) 1557-1563
3. Becker R., and Boyd J. Capital Theory, Equilibrium Analysis, and Recursive Utility (1997), Basil Blackwell, Oxford
4. Burness H.S. Impatience and the preference for advancement in the timing of satisfactions. Journal of Economic Theory 6 (1973) 495-507
5. Burness H.S. On the role of separability assumptions in determining impatience implications. Econometrica 44 (1976) 67-78
6. Diamond P.A. The evaluation of infinite utility streams. Econometrica 33 (1965) 170-177
7. Kolmogorov A.N., and Fomin S.V. Introductory Real Analysis (1970), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
8. Koopmans T.C. Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28 (1960) 287-309
9. Koopmans T.C. Representation of preference orderings over time. In: McGuire C.B., and Roy Radner (Eds). Decision and Organization (1972), North Holland, Amsterdam
10. Koopmans T.C., Diamond P.A., and Williamson R.E. Stationary utility and time perspective. Econometrica 32 (1964) 82-100
11. Royden H.L. Real Analysis. third ed. (1988), MacMillan, New York
12. Sierpinski W. Cardinal and Ordinal Numbers (1965), Polish Scientific, Warsaw
13. Svensson L.G. Equity among generations. Econometrica 48 (1980) 1251-1256