A greedy heuristic using adjoint functions for the optimization of seed and needle configurations in prostate seed implant

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 815-828

  Yoo, Sua ^a   Kowalok, Michael E ^b   Thomadsen, Bruce R ^c   Henderson, Douglass L ^d  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; AUTOMATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ADJOINT FUNCTIONS; REAL-TIME TREATMENT; REGION OF INTEREST (ROI); TREATMENT-PLANNING ALGORITHMS;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BRACHYTHERAPY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANT; IRRADIATION; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; NEEDLE; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; SPACE; STRENGTH; TREATMENT PLANNING; BIOPHYSICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOTHERAPY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; MALE; PROSTATE TUMOR; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; BIOPHYSICS; BRACHYTHERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 34047259491     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/3/020     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bell G and Glasstone S 1970 Nuclear Reactor Therapy (Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand) chapters 1 and 6
2. Brooke A, Kendrick D, Meeraus A and Raman R 1997 GAMS: A User's Guide-Release 2.25, Version 92 (Washington, DC: GAMS Development Corporation) (www.gams.com)
3. Chen Y, Boyer A L and Xing L 2000 A dose-volume histogram based optimization algorithm for ultrasound guided prostate implants Med. Phys. 27 2286-92
4. Difilippo F C 1998 Forward and adjoint methods for radiotherapy planning Med. Phys. 25 1702-8
5. D'Souza W D, Meyer R R, Thomadsen B R and Ferris M C 2001 An iterative sequential mixed-integer approach to automated prostate brachytherapy treatment plan optimization Phys. Med. Biol. 46 297-322
6. Ezzell G 2005 Optimization in brachytherapy Brachytherapy Physics 2nd edn ed B Thomadsen, M Rivard and W Butler (Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing) chapter 22
7. Gokhale P, Hussein E M A and Kulkarni N 1994 Determination of beam orientation in radiotherapy planning Med. Phys. 21 393-400
8. ICRU 1997 Dose and volume specification for reporting interstitial therapy ICRU Report 58 (Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement)
9. Jeraj R and Keall P 1999 Monte Carlo-based inverse treatment planning Phys. Med. Biol. 44 1885-96
10. Kowalok M E 2004 Adjoint methods for external beam inverse treatment planning PhD Thesis (Madison, WI: Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison)
11. Lee E K, Gallagher R J, Silvern D, Wuu D S and Zaider M 1999 Treatment planning for brachytherapy: an integer programming model, two computational approaches and experiments with permanent prostate implant planning Phys. Med. Biol. 44 145-65
12. Lewis E E and Miller W F Jr 1993 Computational Methods of Neutron Transport (LaGrange Park, IL: American Nuclear Society) chapter 1
13. Meyer R R 1979 Integer Programming (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Madison, Computer Science Department)
14. Narayana V, Roberson P L, Pu T, Sandler H, Winfield R H and McLaughlin P W 1997 Impact of differences in ultrasound and computed tomography volumes on treatment planning of permanent prostate implant Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 37 1181-5
15. Nath R, Anderson L L, Meli J A, Olch A J, Stitt J A and Williamson J F 1997 Code of practice for brachytherapy physics: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 56 Med. Phys. 24 1557-98
16. Nath R, Anderson L L, Weaver K A, Williamson J F and Meigooni A S 1995 Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: recommendations of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 43 Med. Phys. 22 209-33
17. Nemhauser G L, Kan A H G R and Todd M J 1989 Optimization (New York: Elsevier)
18. Pouliot J, Tremblay D, Roy J and Filice S 1996 Optimization of permanent 125I prostate implants using fast simulated annealing Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 36 711-20
19. Roy J N, Wallner K E, Chiu-Tsao S T, Anderson L L and Lin C C 1991 CT-based optimized planning for transperineal prostate implant with customized template Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 21 483-9
20. Saw C B, Suntharalingam N and Wu A 1993 Concept of dose non-uniformity in interstitial brachytherapy Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 26 519-27
21. Thompson S A, Fung A Y C and Zaider M 2002 Optimal needle arrangement for intra-operative planning in permanent I-125 prostate implants Phys. Med. Biol. 47 N209-15
22. Williamson J F, Coursey B M, DeWerd L A, Hanson W F, Nath R and Ibbott G 1999 Guidance to users of Nycomed Amersham and North American Scientific, Inc. I-125 interstitial sources: dosimetry and calibration changes: recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Ad Hoc Subcommittee on low-energy seed dosimetry Med. Phys. 26 570
23. Yoo S, Kowalok M E, Henderson D L and Thomadsen B R 2003 Treatment planning for prostate brachytherapy using region of interest adjoint functions and a greedy heuristic Phys. Med. Biol. 48 4077-90
24. Yu Y, Anderson L L, Li Z, Mellenberg D E, Nath R, Schell M C, Waterman F M, Wu A and Blasko J C 1999 Permanent prostate seed implant brachytherapy: report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group No. 64 Med. Phys. 26 2054-76
25. Yu Y and Schell M C 1996 A genetic algorithm for the optimization of prostate implants Med. Phys. 23 2085-91