Scientific production of electronic health record research, 1991-2005

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 191-196

  Wen, Hsyien Chia ^a   Ho, Yuh Shan ^a   Jian, Wen Shan ^a,b   Li, Hsien Chang ^a,c   Hsu, Yi Hsin Elsa ^a  

^a TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c CHUNG YUAN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Electronic health records (EHRs); Science citation index (SCI)

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; NATURAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

BIBLIOMETRICS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR); SCIENCE CITATION INDEX (SCI);

HEALTH CARE;

AFRICA; ARTICLE; ASIA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EUROPE; LANGUAGE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NETHERLANDS; NORWAY; PACIFIC ISLANDS; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCISEARCH; SWITZERLAND; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE;

BIBLIOMETRICS; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; TAIWAN;

EID: 34047259370     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, accessed at http://www.ahrq.gov on July 22, 2006.
2. Davis L.S. Prototype for future computer medical records. Comput. Biomed. Res. 3 (1970) 539
3. Litzelman D.K., Dittus R.S., Miller M.E., and Tierney W.M. Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 8 6 (1993) 311-317
4. Institute of Science Information, Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition, 2005.
5. Central Intelligence Agency, The world factbook: Population, accessed at http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/as.html#Econ on July 12, 2006.
6. C.P. Waegemann, Status Report 2002: Electronic Health Records, accessed at http://www.medrecinst.com/uploadedFiles/MRILibrary/StatusReport.pdf on July 12, 2006.
7. Medical Records Institute's Seventh Annual Survey of Electronic Health Record Trends and Usage for 2005, accessed at http://www.medrecinst.com/files/ehrsurvey05.pdf on July 12, 2006.
8. Mon D.T. Defining the differences between the CPR, EMR, and EHR. J. Am. Health Inform. Manage. Assoc. 75 9 (2004) 74-75 77
9. Mon D.T. Further defining e-HIM. J. Am. Health Inform. Manage. Assoc. 75 2 (2004) 54-56
10. Institute of Medicine. Letter Report: Key Capabilities of Electronic Health Record System (2003), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
11. Michelle D. Standard terminology helps advanced EHR. J. Am. Health Inform. Manage. Assoc. 74 10 (2003) 59-60
12. Chaudhry B., Wang J., Wu S., Maglione M., Mojica W., Roth E., Morton S.C., and Shekelle P.G. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann. Intern. Med. 144 (2006) E12-E22
13. Wang S.J., Middleton B., Prosser L.A., Bardon C.G., Spurr C.D., Carchidi P.J., et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am. J. Med. 114 (2003) 397-403
14. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
15. Smith M.F. E-Health: Roadmap for 21st Century Health Care Consumers (2004), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Forum 2004: Health of Nations, Paris
16. Chassin M.R., and Galvin R.W. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 280 (1998) 1000-1005
17. National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators, accessed at http://www.nsf.gov on July 12, 2006.
18. Figueredo E., Perales G., and Blanco F. International publishing in anaesthesia-how do different countries contribute?. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scandin. 47 (2003) 378-382