Stimulating catheters: A thing of the past? [18]

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1001-1002

  Walker, Amy ^a   Roberts, Steve ^a  

^a ALDER HEY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MORPHINE; OPIATE;

ADOLESCENT; ANALGESIA; CATHETERIZATION; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HUMAN; LETTER; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MOTOR NERVE BLOCK; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE TWITCH; NEEDLE; NERVE; NERVE BLOCK; NERVE STIMULATION; PARESTHESIA; PERIPHERAL NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIATIC NERVE; SENSORY NERVE; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; CATHETERIZATION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; HUMANS; NERVE BLOCK; SCIATIC NERVE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 34047246324     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000258802.39649.64     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. van Geffen GJ, Gielen M. Ultrasound-guided subgluteal sciatic nerve blocks with stimulating catheters in children: a descriptive study. Anesth Analg 2006;103:328-33.
2. Sandhu NS, Capan LM. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth 2002;89:254-9.
3. Urmey WF, Stanton J. Inability to consistently elicit a motor response following sensory paraesthesia during interscalene block administration. Anaesthesiology 2002;96:552-4.
4. Bigeleisen PE. Nerve puncture and apparent intraneural injection during ultrasound-guided axillary block does not invariably result in neurologic injury. Anesthesiology 2006;105:779-83.
5. Salinas FV, Neal JM, Sueda LA, et al. Prospective comparison of continuous femoral nerve blockade with nonstimulating catheter placement versus stimulating catheter-guided perineural placement in volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004;29:212-20.