Parameter stability of the functional-structural plant model GREENLAB as affected by variation within populations, among seasons and among growth stages

Annals of Botany

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 61-73

  Ma, Yuntao ^a   Li, Baoguo ^a   Zhan, Zhigang ^a   Guo, Yan ^a   Luquet, Delphine ^b   De Reffye, Philippe ^b,c   Dingkuhn, Michael ^b  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CIRAD   (France)

^c INRIA ROCQUENCOURT   (France)

Author keywords

Allometric relationships; Crop simulation; Functional structural models; Parameter stability; Plant architecture; Sink capacity; Zea mays

Indexed keywords

ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; GENOTYPE; GROWTH; PHENOTYPE; PLANT ARCHITECTURE;

ASIA; BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST;

ZEA MAYS;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MAIZE; PHENOTYPE; SEASON; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGRICULTURE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; SEASONS; VARIATION (GENETICS); ZEA MAYS;

EID: 34047235788     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl245     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, FAO, Rome.
2. Dingkuhn M. 1996. Modelling concepts for the phenotypic plasticity of dry matter and nitrogen partitioning in rice. Agricultural Systems 52: 383-397.
3. Dingkuhn M, de Vries FWTP, de Datta SK, van Laar HH. 1991. Concepts for a new plant type for direct seeded flooded tropical rice. In: Direct seeded flooded rice in the tropics. Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 17-38.
4. Dingkuhn M, Luquet D, Quilot B, de Reffye P. 2005. Environmental and genetic control of morphogenesis in crops: towards models simulating phenotypic plasticity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 1289-1302.
5. Dingkuhn M, Luquet D, Kim HK, Tambour L, Clément-Vidal A. 2006. EcoMeristem, a model of morphogenesis and competition among sinks in rice. 2. Simulating genotype responses to phosphorus deficiency. Functional Plant Biology 33: 325-337.
6. Donald CM. 1968. The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17: 385-403.
7. Drouet JL. 2003. MODICA and MODANCA: modelling the threedimensional shoot structure of graminaceous crops from two methods of plant description. Field Crops Research 83: 215-222.
8. Drouet JL, Pagès L. 2003. GRAAL: a model of growth, architecture and carbon allocation during vegetative phase of the whole maize plant: model description and parameterisation. Ecological Modelling 165: 147-173.
9. Echarte L, Andrade FH. 2003. Harvest index stability of Argentinean maize hybrids released between 1965 and 1993. Field Crops Research 82: 1-12.
10. Evers JB, Vos J, Fournier C, Andrieu B, Chelle M, Struik PC. 2006. An architectural model of spring wheat: evaluation of the effects of population density and shading on model parameterization and performance. Ecological Modelling, doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.042.
11. Guo Y, Ma YT, Zhan ZG, Li BG, Dingkuhn M, Luquet D, et al. 2006. Parameter optimization and field validation of the functional-structural model GREENLAB for maize. Annals of Botany 97: 217-230.
12. Hammer GL, Kropff MJ, Sinclair TR, Porter JR. 2002. Future contributions of crop modelling - from heuristics and supporting decision making to understanding genetic regulation and aiding crop improvement. European Journal of Agronomy 18: 15-31.
13. Luquet D, Dingkuhn M, Kim HK, Tambour L, Clément-Vidal A. 2006. EcoMeristem, a model of morphogenesis and competition among sinks in rice. 1. Concept, validation and sensitivity analysis. Functional Plant Biology 33: 309-323.
14. Prusinkiewicz P, Lindenmayer A, Hanan J. 1988. Developmental models of herbaceous plants for computer imagery purposes. Computer Graphics 22: 141-150.
15. Reymond M, Muller B, Leonardi A, Charcosset A, Tardieu F. 2003. Combining quantitative trait loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyse the genetic variability of the responses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiology 131: 664-675.
16. Ritchie JT, NeSmith DS. 1991. Temperature and crop development. In: Hanks RJ, Ritchie JT eds. Modeling plant and soil systems. American Society of Agronomy Monograph No. 31. Madison, WI, pp. 5-29
17. Sinoquet H, Thanisawanyangkura S, Mabrouk H, Kasemspa P. 1998. Characterization of the light environment in canopies using 3D digitizing and image processing. Annals of Botany 82: 203-212.
18. Tardieu F. 2003. Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science 8: 9-14.
19. Tivet F, da Silveira Pinheiro B, de Raïssac M, Dingkuhn M. 2001. Leaf blade dimensions of rice (Oryza sativa L. and Oryza glaberrima Steud.): relationships between tillers and main stem. Annals of Botany 88: 507-511.
20. de la Vega AJ, Hall AJ, Kroonenberg PM. 2002. Investigating the physiological bases of predictable and unpredictable genotype by environment interactions using three-mode pattern analysis. Field Crops Research 78: 165-183.
21. Wright SD, McConnaughay KDM. 2002. Interpreting phenotypic plasticity: the importance of ontogeny. Plant Species Biology 17: 119-131.
22. Yan HP, Kang MZ, de Reffye P, Dingkuhn M. 2004. A dynamic, architectural plant model simulating resource-dependent growth. Annals of Botany 93: 591-602.
23. Yin XY, Stam P, Kropff MJ, Schapendonk AHCM. 2003. Crop modeling, QTL mapping, and their complementary role in plant breeding. Agronomy Journal 95: 90-98.
24. Zhan ZG, de Reffye P, Houllier F, Hu BG. 2003. Fitting a functional-structural growth model with plant architectural data. In: Hu BG, Jaeger M eds. Proceedings of Plant Growth Modeling and Applications (PMA'03). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press/Springer-Verlag, 236-249.