Similarities and differences between retrospective and pre-post measurements of outcome

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 359-364

  Flückiger, Christoph ^a   Regli, Daniel ^a   Grawe, Klaus ^a   Lutz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

EID: 34047233179     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10503300600830728     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. and Wothke, W. (1999) AMOS 4.0 user's guide, SPSS, Chicago
2. Barkham, M., Margison, F., Lucock, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Evans, C. and Benson, L. (2001) Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, pp. 184-196.
3. Baumann, U., Sodemann, U. and Tobien, H. (1980) Direkte versus indirekte Veránderungsdiagnostik [Direct vs indirect measurement of change]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 3, pp. 201-216.
4. Bortz, J. (2005) Statistik für Human und Sozialwissenschaftler [Statistics for humanities and social scientists], Springer, Berlin
5. Cattell, R. B. and Vogelmann, S. (1977) A comprehensive trial of the scree and KG-criteria for determining the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12, pp. 289-325.
6. Derogatis, L. R. (1986) Symptom-Check-Liste (SCL-90-R), Beltz, Weinheim, Germany
7. Derogatis, L. R. (1993) Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual, National Computer Systems, Minneapolis, MN
8. Franke, G. (1995) SCL-90. Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis-Deutsche Version. Manual [The Symptom Checklist by Derogatis-German Version. Manual], Beltz, Göttingen, Germany
9. Franke, G. (2000) BSI. Brief Symptom Inventory von L. R. Derogatis (Kurzform der SCL-90-R)-Deutsche Version. Manual [Brief Symptom Inventory by L. R. Derogatis], Beltz
10. Grawe, K. (1982) Der Veränderungsprozessbogen (VPB). Ein Instrument zur deskriptiven Einzelfallanalyse psychotherapeutisch induzierter Veränderungsprozesse [Psychotherapeutic Changes Schedule]. Diagnostik in der Psychotherapie, pp. 231-252. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, Germany
11. Grawe, K. (2002) Psychological therapy, Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany
12. Grawe, K. (2004) Neuropsychotherapie [Neuropsychotherapy], Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany
13. Grawe, K. and Braun, U. (1994) Qualitätskontrolle in der Psychotherapie [Quality control in the psychotherapy practice]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 23, pp. 242-267.
14. Grawe, K., Caspar, F. and Ambühl, H. (1990) Therapievergleich: Wirkungsvergleich und differentielle Indikation [The Bernese Comparative Treatment Study: Comparison of effects and differential indication]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 19, pp. 338-361.
15. Grob, A. (1995) Subjective well-being and significant life events across their life span. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54, pp. 3-18.
16. Grob, A., Lüthi, R., Kaiser, F. and Flammer, A. (1991) Berner Fragebogen zum Wohlbefinden Jugendlicher (BFW) [The Bern Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire for adolescents (BQW)]. Diagnostica, 37, pp. 66-75.
17. Hedge, L. V. and Olkin, I. (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis, Academic Press, Orlando, FL
18. Hill, C. E. and Lambert, M. J. (2004) Methodological issues on studying psychotherapy processes and outcomes. Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, pp. 84-135. Wiley, New York
19. Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G. and Villaseñor, V. S. (1988) Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, pp. 885-892.
20. Horowitz, L. M., Strauss, B. and Kordy, H. (2000) Das Inventar zur Erfassung interpersonaler Probleme (IIP-64-D). Manual [Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, German version. Manual], Beltz, Weinheim, Germany
21. Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, pp. 424-453.
22. Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria vs. new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, pp. 1-55.
23. Itten, S. (2002) University of Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland
24. Jacobson, N. S. and Truax, P. (1991) Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, pp. 12-19.
25. Kastner, S. and Basler, H. -D. (1997) Messen Veränderungsfragebögen wirklich Veränderungen? [Do questionnaires for the assessment of change really assess changes?]. Schmerz, 11, pp. 254-262.
26. Kazdin, A. E. (1999) The meanings and measurings of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, pp. 332-339.
27. Kiresuk, T. and Lund, S. (1979) Goal attainment scaling: Research, evaluation and utilization. Program evaluation in health fields, 2, pp. 214-237. Human Science Press, New York
28. Kiresuk, T. and Sherman, R. (1968) Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4, pp. 345-453.
29. Kline, R. B. (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, Guilford Press, New York
30. Kohlmann, T. and Raspe, H. (1998) Zur Messung patientennaher Erfolgskriterien in der medizinischen Rehabilitation [Measurement of patient outcomes in medical rehabilitation]. Rehabilitation, 37, pp. 30-37.
31. Lambert, M. J., Gregersen, A. T. and Burlingame, G. M. (2004) The Outcome Questionnaire-45. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Volume 3: Instruments for adults, pp. 191-234. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
32. Lambert, M. J. and Ogles, B. M. (2004) The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, pp. 139-193. Wiley, New York
33. Lee, H. B. and Comrey, A. L. (1979) Distortions in a commonly used factor analytic procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, pp. 301-321.
34. Lutz, W. (2002) Patient-focused psychotherapy research and individual treatment process as scientific groundwork for an empirically based clinical practice. Psychotherapy Research, 12, pp. 251-272.
35. Lutz, W. and Grawe, W. (2005) Psychotherapieforschung [Psychotherapy research]. Handbuch der Klinischen Psychologie und Psychotherapie. Reihe: Handbuch der Psychologie, Band 1, pp. 92-100. Hogrefe-Verlag, Göttingen, Germany
36. Lutz, W., Leach, C., Barkham, M., Lucock, M., Stiles, W. B. and Evans, C. (2005) Predicting change for individual psychotherapy clients on the basis of their nearest neighbors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, pp. 904-913.
37. Lutz, W., Martinovich, Z. and Howard, K. I. (2001) Vorhersage individueller Psychotherapieverläufe [Prediction of the course of individual psychotherapy]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 30, pp. 104-113.
38. Meyer, F. and Schulte, D. (2002) Zur Validität der Beurteilung des Therapieerfolgs durch Therapeuten [The validity of therapists' judgment of therapy success]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 31, pp. 53-61.
39. Michalak, J., Kosfelder, J., Meyer, F. and Schulte, D. (2003) Messung des Therapieerfolgs. Veränderungsmasse oder retrospektive Erfolgsbeurteilung [Measurement of therapy success: Pre-post effect sizes and retrospective success evaluation]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 32, pp. 94-103.
40. Nachtigall, C. and Suhl, U. (2005) Evaluation intaindividueller Veränderung [Evaluation of intra-individual change]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 34, pp. 241-247.
41. Olkin, J. (1967) Improving experimental design and statistical analysis, pp. 102-128. Rand McNally
42. Orlinsky, D. E., Rönnestad, M. H. and Willutzki, U. (2004) Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcome research: Continuity and change. Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, pp. 307-389. Wiley, New York
43. Schmidt, J., Nübling, R. and Wittmann, W. W. (2001) Ergebnisqualität psychosomatischer Rehabilitation. Zusammenhänge zwischen direkten und indirekten Veränderungsmessungen [Outcome-quality of psychosomatic rehabilitation. Correlations between direct and indirect measurements of outcome]. Tagungsband des 10. Rehabilitationswissenschaftlichen Kolloquiums in Halle, pp. 386-387. DRV-Schriften, Frankfurt, Germany
44. Schulte, D. (1993) Wie soll Therapieerfolg gemessen werden?. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 19, pp. 374-393.
45. Schulte, D. (1995) How treatment success could be assessed?. Psychotherapy Research, 5, pp. 281-296.
46. Seligman, M. E. P. (1995) The effectiveness of psychotherapy: The Consumer Reports study. American Psychologist, 50, pp. 965-974.
47. (2003) SPSS 12 software packet [Computer software], SPSS inc, Chicago
48. (2001) Psychodiagnostik in Klinischer Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie [Diagnostics in abnormal psychology, psychiatry and psychotherapy], Thieme
49. Willutzki, U. (1999)
50. Zielke, M. (1999) Direkte und indirekte Veränderungsmessung bei Interventionsansätzen-Methoden und Ergebnisse [Direct and indirect outcome measurement-Methods and results]. Praxis klinische Verhaltensmedizin und Rehabilitation, 45, pp. 3-13.
51. Zielke, M. and Kopf-Mehnert, C. (1978) Beltz
52. Zwick, W. R. and Velicer, W. F. (1986) Comparison of five rules of determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, pp. 432-442.