Ten simple rules for a successful collaboration

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 0335-0336

  Vicens, Quentin ^a   Bourne, Philip E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SIMPLE++;

EDITORIAL; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; SCIENTIST; COOPERATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RESEARCH; SCIENCE;

COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; RESEARCH; SCIENCE;

EID: 34047207026     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030044     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Borner K, Maru JT, Goldstone RL (2004) The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 5266-5273.
2. Rubin GM (2006) Janelia Farm: An experiment in scientific culture. Cell 125: 209-212.
3. Smalheiser NR, Perkins GA, Jones S (2005) Guidelines for negotiating scientific collaboration. PLoS Biol 3: e217.
4. Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (2006) Making the right move. A practical guide to scientific management for postdocs and new faculty. Chevy Chase. Available: http://www.hhmi.org/labmanagement. Accessed 21 February 2007.
5. Aiken JW (2006) What's the value of conferences? Scientist 20: 54-56.