Landscape geometry determines community response to disturbance

Oikos

Volumn 116, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 690-699

  Starzomski, Brian M ^a,b   Srivastava, Diane S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b BAMFIELD MARINE SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ARTHROPOD; COMMUNITY RESPONSE; CONNECTIVITY; DISPERSAL; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT LOSS; HABITAT STRUCTURE; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MOSS; PATCH SIZE; PHYSICAL DISTURBANCE; REGENERATION; SPECIES RICHNESS;

BRYOPHYTA; ORIBATIDA;

EID: 34047187035     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15547.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Brown, J. H. and Kodric-Brown, A. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. - Ecology 58: 445-449.
2. Cadotte, M. W. 2006a. Dispersal and species diversity: a meta-analysis. - Am. Nat. 168: 913-924.
3. Cadotte, M. W. 2006b. Metacommunity influences on community richness at multiple spatial scales: a microcosm experiment. - Ecology 87: 1008-1016.
4. Cadotte, M. W. and Fukami, T. 2005. Dispersal, spatial scale and species diversity in a hierarchically structured experimental landscape. - Ecol. Lett. 8: 548-557.
5. Cottenie, K. and De Meester, L. 2004. Metacommunity structure: synergy of biotic interactions as selective agents and dispersal as fuel. - Ecology 85: 114-119.
6. Davies, K. F. et al. 2000. Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments? - Ecology 81: 1450-1461.
7. Didham, R. K. et al. 1998. Beetle species responses to tropical forest fragmentation. - Ecol. Monogr. 68: 295-323.
8. Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34: 487-515.
9. Forbes, A. E. and Chase, J. M. 2002. The role of habitat connectivity and landscape geometry in experimental zooplankton metacommunities. - Oikos 96: 433-440.
10. Fukami, T. 2004. Community assembly along a species pool gradient: implications for multiple-scale patterns of species diversity. - Popul. Ecol. 46: 137-147.
11. Gaston, K. J. and Blackburn, T. M. 1995. Birds, body size and the threat of extinction. - Proc. R. Soc. B. 347: 205-212.
12. Gilbert, F. S. et al. 1998. Corridors maintain species richness in the fragmented landscapes of a microecosystem. - Proc. R. Soc. B. 265: 577-582.
13. Gonzalez, A. 2000. Community relaxation in fragmented landscapes: the relation between species, area and age. - Ecol. Lett. 3: 441-448.
14. Gonzalez, A. and Chaneton, E. J. 2002. Heterotroph species extinction, abundance and biomass dynamics in an experimentally fragmented microecosystem. - J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 594-602.
15. Gonzalez, A. et al. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics, abundance and distribution in a microecosystem. - Science 281: 2045-2047.
16. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. - Oxford Univ. Press.
17. Harper, K. A. et al. 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. - Conserv. Biol. 19: 1-15.
18. Holling, C. S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4: 1-23.
19. Honnay, O. et al. 2002. Possible effects of habitat fragmentation and climate change on the range of forest plant species. - Ecol. Lett. 5: 525-530.
20. Hoyle, M. 2004. Causes of the species-area relationship by trophic level in a field-based microecosystem. - Proc. R. Soc. B. 271: 1159-1164.
21. Hoyle, M. 2005. Experimentally fragmented communities are more aggregated. - J. Anim. Ecol. 74: 430-442.
22. Hoyle, M. and Gilbert, F. 2004. Species richness of moss landscapes unaffected by short-term fragmentation. - Oikos 105: 359-367.
23. Kneitel, J. M. and Miller, T. E. 2003. Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea inquilines. - Am. Nat. 162: 165-171.
24. Knudsen, J. W. 1972. Collecting and preserving plants and animals. - Harper and Row.
25. Krantz, G. W. 1978. A manual of acarology. - Oregon State Univ. Bookstores.
26. Krebs, C. J. et al. 1969. Microtus population biology. - Ecology 50: 587-607.
27. Lawton, J. H. 1994. Population dynamic principles. - Proc. R. Soc. B. 344: 61-68.
28. Levey, D. J. et al. 2005. Effects of landscape corridors on seed dispersal by birds. - Science 309: 146-148.
29. MacArthur, R. H. 1972. Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. - Princeton Univ. Press.
30. Moilanen, A. and Hanski, I. 1995. Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. - J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 141-144.
31. Mouquet, N. and Loreau., M. 2003. Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. - Am. Nat. 162: 544-557.
32. Mouquet, N. et al. 2003. Community assembly time and the relationship between local and regional species richness. - Oikos 103: 618-626.
33. Munguia, P. 2004. Successional patterns of pen shell communities at local and regional scales. - J. Anim. Ecol. 73: 64-74.
34. Nee, S. and May, R. M. 1992. Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. - J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 37-40.
35. Redding, T. E. et al. 2003. Spatial patterns of soil temperature and moisture across subalpine forest-clearcut edges in the southern interior of British Columbia. - Can. J. Soil Sci. 83: 121-130.
36. Ries, L. et al. 2004. Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models and variability explained. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 35: 491-522.
37. Roland, J. and Taylor, P. D. 1997. Insect parasitoid species respond to forest structure at different spatial scales. - Nature 386: 710-713.
38. Ricklefs, R. E. and Schluter, D. (eds) 1993. Species diversity in ecological communities. - Univ. of Chicago Press.
39. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
40. Sala, O. E. et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. - Science 287: 1770-1774.
41. Schmiegelow, F. K. A. et al. 1997. Are boreal birds resilient to forest fragmentation? An experimental study of short-term community responses. - Ecology 78: 1914-1932.
42. Simberloff, D. 2000. What do we really know about habitat fragmentation? - Texas J. Sci. 52: 5-22.
43. Solé, R. V. et al. 2004. Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity collapse in neutral communities. - Ecol. Comp. 1: 65-75.
44. Srivastava, D. S. et al. 2004. Are natural microcosms useful model systems for ecology? - Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 379-384.
45. Taylor, P. D. et al. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. - Oikos 68: 571-573.
46. Turner, I. M. 1995. Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forests: a review of the evidence. - J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 200-209.
47. Villard, M. -A. et al. 1999. Fragmentation effects on forest birds: relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. - Conserv. Biol. 13: 774-783.
48. Walter, D. E. and Proctor, H. C. 1999. Mites: ecology, evolution and behaviour. - Univ. of New South Wales Press and CAB Int.
49. Warren, P. H. 1996a. Dispersal and destruction in a multiple habitat system: an experimental approach using protist communities. - Oikos 77: 317-325.
50. Warren, P. H. 1996b. The effects of between-habitat dispersal rate on protist communities and metacommunities in microcosms at two spatial scales. - Oecologia 105: 132-140.
51. With, K. A. et al. 1997. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. - Oikos 78: 151-169.