Efficient particle labeling in atomistic simulations

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 126, Issue 12, 2007, Pages

  Meloni, Simone ^a   Rosati, Mario ^a   Colombo, Luciano ^b,c  

^a CASPUR   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

ATOMISTIC SIMULATIONS; LABEL REORDERING; LINKED CELL ALGORITHM;

ATOMIC PHYSICS;

EID: 34047173611     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.2719690     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. L. Verlet, Phys. Rev. 159, 98 (1967).
2. R. W. Hockney and J. W. Eastwood, Computing Simulations Using Partides (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981).
3. D. J. Auerbach, W. Paul, C. Lutz, A. F. Bakker, W. E. Rudge, and F. F. Abraham, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 4481 (1987).
4. G. Sutmann and V. Stegailov, J. Mol. Liq. 125, 197 (2006).
5. This result has been obtained on an AMD 64-bit Opteron processor by using the well-known OROMACS code to simulate a 98 304-atom argon system (Lennard-Jones force filed with standard GROMACS parameters) with 0.025 at./A3 density. The temperature of the liquid (crystalline) sample was fixed at 100 K (10 K).
6. Z. Yao, J.-S. Wang, G.-R. Liu, and M. Cheng, Comput. Phys. Commun. 161, 27 (2004).
7. D. R. Mason, Comput. Phys. Commun. 170, 31 (2005).
8. F. A. Stillinger and T. A. Weber, Phys. Rev. B 31, 5262 (1985).
9. 3. The initial labeling of atoms was not changed during the melt-quench procedure.
10. E. Cuthill and J. McKee, Proceedings of the 24th National Conference of ACM (ACM, New York, 1969), pp. 157-172.
11. http://www.csit.fsu.edu/burkardt/f_src/sparsepak/sparsepak.html
12. A. Rahman, Phys. Rev. 136A, 405 (1964).
13. G. M. Amdahl, AFTPS Conf. Proc. 30, 483 (1967).