A case study evaluation of 11 hypothetical software system evolution laws

Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering: part of the 23rd IASTED International Multi-Conference on Applied Informatics, SE 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 26-31

  Calås, Göran ^a   Mankefors Christiernin, Stefan ^a   Boklund, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY WEST   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Architecture; Design patterns; Prediction; Software evolution

Indexed keywords

DESIGN PATTERNS; EVOLUTION CHARACTERISTICS; PLATFORM ARCHITECTURE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING DOMAIN; SOFTWARE EVOLUTION; SOFTWARE SYSTEM EVOLUTIONS; TELECOM MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; THEORY OF INVENTIVE PROBLEM SOLVING;

ARCHITECTURE; FORECASTING; INFORMATION SCIENCE; PROBLEM SOLVING;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 34047171646     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. rd International Conference on Software Engineering (2001).
2. Lehman MM and Ramil J F, An approach to a theory of software evolution, International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (2001).
3. Lehman MM (2002). Rules and tools for software evolution planning and management, Annals of Software Engineering, vol. 11 (2001).
4. nd International Conference on Software Engineering (2000).
5. Terninko J et al. (1998). Systematic innovation; An introduction to TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) (St, Lucy Press, Boca Roton, 1998).
6. Fey R V, TRIZ Methodology for Inventive Engineering, The TRIZ Group LLC, West Bloomfield, MI, USA (2000).
7. Petrov V, The laws of system evolution, TRIZ Journal. http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2002/03/b/.
8. Scacchi W, Understanding Open Source Software Evolution: Applying, Breaking, and Rethinking the laws of software evolution, Technical report, Institute for Software Research, University of California, Irvine, USA (2003).