Effect of emission constraints on short-term unit commitment

Proceedings of the Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference - MELECON

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 973-977

  Simopoulos, D N ^a   Giannakopoulos, Y S ^a   Kavatza, S D ^a   Vournas, C D ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

EMISSION CONSTRAINTS; KYOTO PROTOCOL; OBJECTIVE FUNCTION;

EMISSION CONTROL;

EID: 34047130376     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, English Conference of the Parties, Third session Kyoto, 1-10 December 1997.
2. S. J. Wang, S. M. Shahidehpour, D. S. Kirschen, S. Mokhtari, and G. D. Irisarri, "Short-term generation scheduling with transmission and environmental constraints using an augmented lagrangian relaxation," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 10, pp. 1294-1301, Aug. 1995.
3. K. H. Abdul-Rahman, S. M. Shahidehpour, M. Aganagic, and S. Mokhtari, "A practical resource scheduling with OPF constraints," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 11, pp. 254-259, Feb. 1996.
4. H. Ma and S. M. Shahidehpour, "Unit commitment with transmission security and voltage constraints," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 14, pp. 757-764, May 1999.
5. H. Y. Yamin and S. M. Shahidehpour, "Unit commitment using a hybrid model between lagrangian relaxation and genetic algorithm in competitive electricity markets," Electric Power Syst. Res., vol. 68, pp. 83-92, 2004.
6. B. Lu and M. Shahidehpour, "Unit commitment with flexible generating units," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, pp. 1022-1034, May 2005.
7. K. P. Wong, B. Fan, C. S. Chang, and A. C. Liew, "Multi-objective generation dispatch using bi-criterion global optimisation," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 10, pp. 1813-1819, Nov. 1995.
8. F. Zhuang and F. D. Galliana, "Unit commitment by simulated annealing," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 5, pp. 311-318, Feb. 1990.
9. A. H. Mantawy, Y. L. Abdel-Magid, and S. Z. Selim, "A simulated annealing algorithm for unit commitment," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 13, pp. 197-204, Feb. 1998.
10. G. K. Purushothama and L. Jenkins, "Simulated annealing with local search-a hybrid algorithm for unit commitment," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 18, pp. 273-278, Feb. 2003.
11. D. N. Simopoulos, S. D. Kavatza, and C. D. Vournas, "Unit commitment by an enhanced simulated annealing algorithm," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, pp. 68-76, Feb. 2006.
12. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, Jr., and M. P. Vecchi, "Optimization by simulated annealing," Science, vol. 220, pp. 671-680, May 1983.
13. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, "Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines," J. of Chemical Physics, vol. 21, pp. 1087-1092, June 1953.
14. Commission Decision 2004/156/EC establishing guidelines for the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
15. C. Wang and S. M. Shahidehpour, "Effects of ramp-rate limits on unit commitment and economic dispatch," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 8, pp. 1341-1350, Aug. 1993.