The language of visuals: Text + graphics = visual rhetoric

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 57-70

  Amare, Nicole ^a   Manning, Alan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Document design; Graphics; Peirce; Semiotics; Visual rhetoric

Indexed keywords

GRAPHIC METHODS; SEMIOTICS; SPEECH COMMUNICATION; TEACHING; TECHNICAL WRITING;

TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION; VISUAL RHETORIC; VISUAL-LANGUAGE SYSTEM;

VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 34047109117     PISSN: 03611434     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TPC.2006.890851     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. C. Handa, Ed., Visual Rhetoric in a Digital World: A Critical Sourcebook. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2004.
2. M. Solomon, "The power of punctuation," in The Idea of Design: A Design Issues Reader, V. Margolin and R. Buchanan, Eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995, pp. 113-117.
3. R. Barthes, "Rhetoric of the image," in Image, Music, Text, S. Heath, Ed. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977, pp. 32-51.
4. G. Kress and T. van Leeuwen, Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge, 1996.
5. C. S. Peirce, Collected Papers, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, Eds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1935, vol. 2.
6. S. A. Bernhardt, "Seeing the text," College Composition Common., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 66-78, 1986.
7. M. S. Shauf, "The problem of electronic argument: A humanist's perspective," Comput. Composition, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 33-37, 2001.
8. J. Kalmbach, "The ransom note fallacy and the acquisition of typographic emphasis," in Working With Words and Images: New Steps in an Old Dance, N. Allen, Ed. Westport, CT: Ablex, 2002, pp. 43-56.
9. H. J. Ehses, "Representing Macbeth: A case study in visual rhetoric," in Design Discourse: History/Theory/Criticism, V. Margolin, Ed. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1989, pp. 187-197.
10. J. A. Blair, "The possibility and actuality of visual argument," Argumentation Advocacy, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 23-39, 1996.
11. S. McCloud, Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: Harper Collins, 1994.
12. C. Stroupe, "Visualizing English: Recognizing the hybrid literacy of visual and verbal authorship on the web," College English, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 607-32, 2000.
13. S. Dragga and D. Voss, "Cruel pies: The inhumanity of technical illustrations," Tech. Common., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 265-274, 2001.
14. R. Horn, Visual Language: Global Communication for the 21st Century. Bainbridge, WA: MacroVU, 1998.
15. A. Manning and N. Amare, "Visual-rhetoric ethics: Beyond accuracy and injury," Tech. Common., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 195-211, 2006.
16. A. Manning and N. Amare, "Using visual rhetoric to avoid PowerPoint pitfalls," in Int. Professional Communication Conf. Proc., 2005, pp. 281-287.
17. A. Manning, "What is thought?," IEEE Trans. Prof. Common., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 50-53, Mar. 2002.
18. A. Manning, "What is explanation?," IEEE Trans. Prof. Common., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 53-57, Mar. 2001.
19. T. L. Chambers, A. Manning, and L. J. Theriot, "A new theory for the assignment of members to engineering design teams," presented at the Proc. ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conf., Las Cruces, NM, 2000, Paper 76B2.
20. A. Manning, "Error and the growth of technical understanding," IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 123-127, Jun. 1999.
21. A. Manning, "Interface: Scott McCloud's understanding comics," IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 66-69, Mar. 1998.