Formalized classification of thermophilous oak forests in the Czech Republic: What brings the Cocktail method?

Preslia

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-21

  Roleček, Jan ^a  

^a MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Methodology; Phytosociology; Quercetalia pubescenti petraeae; Quercus; Syntaxonomy; Vegetation survey

Indexed keywords

PHYTOSOCIOLOGY; SYNTAXONOMY; VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION; VEGETATION TYPE;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EURASIA; EUROPE;

CARICI; POTENTILLA ALBA; QUERCUS; TORMINALIS;

EID: 34047103952     PISSN: 00327786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Borhidi A. (2003): Magyarország növénytársulásai. - Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
2. Bruelheide H. (1995): Die Grülandgesellschaften des Harzes und ihre Standortsbedingungen. Mit einem Beitrag zum Gliederungsprinzip auf der Basis von statistisch ermittelten Artengruppen. - Diss. Bot. 244: 1-338.
3. Bruelheide H. (1997): Using formal logic to classify vegetation. - Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 32: 41-46.
4. Bruelheide H. (2000): A new measure of fidelity and its application to defining species groups. - J. Veg. Sci. 11: 167-178.
5. Chytrý M. (1997): Thermophilous oak forests in the Czech Republic: Syntaxonomical revision of the Quercetalia pubescenti-petraeae. - Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 32: 221-258.
6. Chytrý M. (ed.) (2007): Vegetace České republiky. 1. Travinná a keříčková vegetace Vegetation of the Czech Republic. 1. Grassland and heathland vegetation. - Academia, Praha.
7. Chytý M., Tichý L., Holt J. & Botta-Dukát J. (2002): Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. - J. Veg. Sci. 13: 79-90.
8. Chytrý M. & Horaák J. (1997): Plant communities of the thermophilous oak forests in Moravia. - Preslia 68: 193-240.
9. Chytrý M. & Rafajová M. (2003): Czech National Phytosociological Database: basic statistics of the available vegetation-plot data. - Preslia 75: 1-15.
10. Egler F. E. (1954): Philosophical and practical considerations of the Braun-Blanquet system of phytosociology.- Castanea 19: 54-60.
11. Ewald J. (2003): A critique for phytosociology. - J. Veg. Sci. 14: 291-296.
12. Gams H. (1954): Vegetationssytematik als Endziel oder Verständigungsmittel? - Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH Stift. Rübel 29: 35-40.
13. Gleason H. A. (1933): Braun-Blanquet's plant sociology. - Ecology 14: 70-74.
14. Grulich V. & Gralichová J. (1986): Kostřava ametystová (Festuca amethystina L.) na jižní Moravě [Festuca amethystina L. in southern Moravia]. - Zprávy Čes. Bot. Společ. 21: 181-188.
15. Hájková P., Hájek M. & Apostolova I. (2006): Diversity of wetland vegetation in the Bulgarian high mountains, main gradients and context-dependence of the pH role. - Plant Ecol.: 111-130.
16. Havlová M. (2006): Syntaxonomical revision of the Molinion meadows in the Czech Republic. - Preslia 78: 87-102.
17. Hédl R. (2005): Co popisuje fytocenologie? O některých nedostatcích středoevropské fytocenologie [What does phytosociology describe? On some shortcomings of central European phytosociology]. - Zpr. Čes. Bot. Společ. 40: 301-314.
18. Jandt U. (1999): Kalkmagerrasen am Südharzrand und im Kyffhäuser. Gliederung im überregionalen Kontext, Verbreitung, Standortsverhältnisse und Flora. - Diss. Bot. 322: 1-246.
19. Knollová L., Chytrý M., Tichý L. & Hájek O. (2005): Stratified resampling of phytosociological databases: some strategies for obtaining more representative data sets for classification studies. - J. Veg. Sci. 16: 479-486.
20. Kočí M., Chytrý M. & Tichý L. (2003): Formalized reproduction of an expert-based phytosociological classification: A case study of subalpine tall-forb vegetation. - J. Veg. Sci. 14: 601-610.
21. Krahulec F. & Lepš J. (1989): Fytocenologie a současná věda o vegetaci. - Preslia 61: 227-244.
22. Kubát K., Hrouda L., Chrtek J. jun., Kaplan Z., Kirschner J. & Štěpánek J. (eds) (2002): Klíč ke květeně České republiky. - Academia, Praha.
23. Lepš J. & Hadincová V. 1992: How reliable are our vegetation analyses? - J. Veg. Sci. 3: 119-124.
24. Lososová Z. (2004): Weed vegetation in southern Moravia (Czech Republic): a formalized phytosociological classification. - Preslia 76: 65-85.
25. Roleček J. (2004): Subcontinental oak forests of Carici fritschii-Quercetum roboris association in Záhorská nížina lowland (Slovakia). - Bull. Slov. Bot. Spoloč. 26: 163-176.
26. Roleček J. (2005): Vegetation types of dry-mesic oak forests in Slovakia. - Preslia 77: 241-261.
27. Sokal R. R. & Rohlf F. J. (1995): Biometry. Ed. 3. - W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
28. ter Braak C. J. F. & Šmilauer P. (2002): CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide. Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). - Biometrics, Wageningen & České Budějovice.
29. Tichý L. (2002): JUICE, software for vegetation classification. - J. Veg. Sci. 13: 451-453.
30. Tichý L. (2005): New similarity indices for the assignment of relevés to vegetation units of an existing phytosociological classification. - Plant Ecol. 179: 67-72.
31. Tichý L. & Chytrý M. (2006): Statistical determination of diagnostic species for site groups of unequal size. - J. Veg. Sci. 17: 809-818.
32. Wiegleb (1989): Explanation and prediction in vegetation science. - Vegetatio 83: 17-34.
33. Willner W., Starlinger F. & Grabherr G. (2005): Deciduous oak forests in Austria - preliminary results from a new survey of the Austrian forest communities. - Botanika Chronika 18: 301-316.