Effects of the fracture water of bedrock on superconducting gravimeter data

Near Surface Geophysics

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 133-139

  Hokkanen, Tero ^a   Korhonen, Kimmo ^b   Virtanen, Heikki ^c   Laine, Eeva Liisa ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^c FINNISH GEODETIC INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEDROCK; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; FRACTURE FLOW; GRAVIMETRY; GRAVITY FIELD; GROUND PENETRATING RADAR; PRECISION; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; WATER TABLE;

FINLAND;

EID: 34047099774     PISSN: 15694445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2006025     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Annan A.P. 2003. Ground Penetrating Radar Principles, Procedures, and Applications. Sensors & Software Inc., Mississauga.
2. Barnett C.T. 1976. Theoretical modeling of the magnetic and gravitational fields of an arbitrary shaped three-dimensional body. Geophysics 41, 1353-1364.
3. Bonatz M. 1967. Der Gravitationseinfluß der Bodenfeuchte, ZfV 92, 135-139.
4. Crossley D., Hinderer J., Casula G., Francis O., Hsu H.-T., Imanishi Y., Jentzsch G., Kääriäinen J., Merriam J., Meurers B., Neumeyer J., Richter B., Shibuya K., Sato T. and van Dam T. 1999. Network of superconducting gravimeters benefits a number of disciplines. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 80, 121-126.
5. Elstner C. and Kautzleben H. 1982. Results of annual gravity measurements along a W-E profile inside the GDR for the period 1970-1980. Proceedings of the General Meeting of the IAG, Tokyo, pp. 341-348.
6. Hinderer J. and Crossley D. 2000. Time variations in gravity and inferences on the Earth's structure and dynamics. Surveys in Geophysics 21, 1-45.
7. Hokkanen T., Virtanen H. and Pirttivaara M. 2007. On hydrogeological noise in superconducting gravimeter data. Near Surface Geophysics 5, 125-131
8. Hubbard S.S., Peterson Jr. J.E., Majer E.L., Zawislanski P.T., Williams K.H, Roberts J. and Wobber F. 1997. Estimation of permeable pathways and water content using tomographic radar data. The Leading Edge 16, 1623-1628.
9. Llubes M., Florsch N., Hinderer J., Longuevergne L. and Amalvict M. 2004. Local hydrology, the Global Geodynamics Project and CHAMP/GRACE perspective: some case studies. Journal of Geodynamics 38, 355-374.
10. Mäkinen J. and Tattari S. 1991. The influence of variation in subsurface water storage observed on gravity. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Earth Tides, Helsinki 1989, pp. 457-471, E Schweizerbartst'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.
11. Meurers B. 1999. Gravitational effects of atmospheric processes in SG gravity data. Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie 17, 57-65.
12. Peter G., Klopping F.J. and Berstis, K.A. 1994. Observing and modeling gravity changes caused by soil and groundwater table variations with superconducting gravimeters in Richmond, Florida, USA. In: Proceedings of 2nd Workshop: Non-Tidal Gravity Changes, Intercomparison between Absolute and Superconducting Gravimeters. Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, 11, 57-69, Luxembourg.
13. Prothero W.A. and Goodkind J. 1968. A superconducting gravimeter. Review of Scientific Instruments 39, 1257-1268.
14. Van Camp M. and Vauterin P. 2005. TSOFT: graphical and interactive software for the analysis of time series and Earth tides. Computers and Geosciences 31(5), 631-640.
15. Virtanen H. 2001. Hydrological studies at the gravity station Metsähovi. Journal of the Geodetic Society of Japan 47, 328-333.
16. Watt A. 1999. 3D Computer Graphics, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.