Explaining with nonshared illustrations: How they constrain explanations

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 204-218

  Jucks, Regina ^a   Bromme, Rainer ^a   Runde, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Expert layperson communication; Illustrations in education; Knowledge divergence; Multiple representations in learning; Online instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947732076     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. In: Boshuizen H.P.A., Bromme R., and Gruber H. (Eds). Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert (2004), Kluwer, Dordrecht, NL
2. Boyle C.M. Difference between patients' and doctors' interpretation of some common medical terms. British Medical Journal 1 (1970) 286-289
3. Bromme R., Jucks R., and Runde A. Barriers and biases in computer-mediated expert-layperson-communication. In: Bromme R., Hesse F.W., and Spada H. (Eds). Barriers, biases and opportunities of communication and cooperation with computers- and how they may be overcome (2005), Springer, New York 89-118
4. Bromme R., Jucks R., and Wagner T. How to refer to "diabetes"? Language in online health advice. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19 (2005) 569-586
5. Bromme R., Rambow R., and Nückles M. Expertise and estimating what other people know: the influence of professional experience and type of knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 7 (2001) 317-330
6. Carney R.N., and Levin J.R. Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review 14 (2002) 5-26
7. Chapman K., Abraham C., Jenkins V., and Fallowfield L. Lay understanding of terms used in cancer consultations. Psychooncology 12 6 (2003) 557-566
8. Chapple A., Campion P., and May C. Clinical terminology: anxiety and confusion amongst families undergoing genetic counseling. Patient Education and Counseling 32 (1997) 81-91
9. Chi M.T.H., Feltovich P.J., and Glaser R. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 2 (1981) 121-152
10. Chi M.T.H., Siler S., and Jeong H. Can tutors monitor students' understanding accurately?. Cognition and Instruction 22 (2004) 363-387
11. Conole G., Dyke M., Oliver M., and Seale J. Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers & Education 43 (2004) 17-33
12. Deetjen P., and Speckmann E.-J. Physiologie (Physiology) (1994), Urban & Schwarzenberg, Munich, Germany
13. Fischer F., Bruhn J., Gräsel C., and Mandl H. Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction 12 (2002) 213-232
14. Glenberg A.M., and Langston W.E. Comprehension of illustrated text: pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language 31 (1992) 129-151
15. Haug M.R. The effects of physician/elder patient characteristics on health communication. Health Communication 8 (1996) 249-262
16. Healey P.G.T., Swoboda N., Umata I., and Katagiri Y. Graphical representations in graphical dialogue. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 57 (2002) 375-395
17. Hinds P.J. The curse of expertise: the effects of expertise and debiasing methods on predictions of novice-performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 5 (1999) 205-221
18. Hinds P.J., Patterson M., and Pfeffer J. Bothered by abstraction: the effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (2001) 1232-1243
19. Isaacs E.A., and Clark H.H. References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116 (1987) 26-37
20. Jacob R., Eirmbter W.H., and Hahn A. Laienvorstellungen von Krankheit und Therapie. Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Repräsentativbefragung (Lay concepts of disease and therapy: results of a nationwide representative survey). Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie 7 3 (1999) 105-119
21. Jucks, R., & Bromme, R. Choice of words in doctor-patient communication: an analysis of health-related Internet sites. Health Communication, in press.
22. Jucks, R., Bromme, R., & Becker, B. -M. Lexical entrainment: is expert's word use adapted to the addressee? Discourse Processes, in press.
23. Jucks R., Bromme R., and Runde A. Audience Design von Experten in der netzgestützten Kommunikation: Die Rolle von Heuristiken über das geteilte Vorwissen (Experts' audience design in network-based communication: the role of heuristics over shared prior knowledge). Zeitschrift für Psychologie 211 (2003) 60-74
24. Keysar B., Barr D.J., and Horton W.S. The egocentric bias of language use: insights from a processing approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science 7 (1998) 46-50
25. Kreuter M.W., Oswald D.M., Bull F.C., and Clark E.M. Are tailored health education materials always more effective than non-tailored materials?. Health Education Research 15 (2000) 305-315
26. Larkin J.H., and Simon H.A. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11 (1987) 65-99
27. Lowe R.K. Background knowledge and the construction of a situational representation from a diagram. European Journal of Psychology of Education 11 (1996) 377-397
28. Mayer R.E. Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology 81 2 (1989) 240-246
29. Mayer R.E. Illustrations that instruct. In: Glaser R. (Ed). Advances in instructional psychology (1993), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 253-284
30. Nickerson R.S. How we know-and sometimes misjudge-what others know: imputing one's own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin 125 (1999) 737-759
31. Reimann P. Multimedia learning: beyond modality. Learning and Instruction 13 2 (2003) 245-252
32. Rossnagel C. Übung und Hörerorientierung beim monologischen Instruieren. Zur Differenzierung einer Grundannahme (Practice effects and listener-adaptation in monological instructions). Sprache & Kognition 14 (1995) 16-27
33. Runde A., Bromme R., and Jucks R. Scripting in net-based medical consultation: The impact of external representations on giving advice and explanations. In: Fischer F., Kollar I., Mandl H., and Haake J.M. (Eds). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning - cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (2007), Springer, New York 57-72
34. Schnotz W., and Bannert M. Construction and interference in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction 13 (2003) 141-156
35. Schnotz W., and Lowe R. External and internal representations in multimedia learning. Introduction to the Special Issue. Learning and Instruction 13 (2003) 117-123
36. Smith M.U. Expertise and the organization of knowledge: unexpected differences among genetic counselors, faculty, and students on problem categorization tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29 2 (1992) 179-206
37. In: Sternberg R., and Horvath J.A. (Eds). Tacit knowledge in professional practice (1999), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
38. Suthers D.D. Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. In: Andriessen J., Baker M., and Suthers D. (Eds). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (2003), Kluwer, Dordrecht, NL 2746
39. Suthers D.D., and Hundhausen C.D. An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 (2003) 183-218