The integration window for shape cues is a function of ambient illumination

Behavioral and Brain Functions

Volumn 3, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Greene, Ernest ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Neuropsychology Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUMINATION; NIGHT VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOPIC VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 33947722122     PISSN: 17449081     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-3-15     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Titchener EB Outline: Of Psychology New York: Macmillan 1899:218.
2. Sperling G: The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychol Monogr 1960 74:1-29.
3. Neisser U: Cognitive Psychology New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1967.
4. Haber RN, Standing L: Direct measures of short-term visual storage. Quart J Exp Psychol 1969, 21:43-54.
5. Greene E: Information persistence in the integration of partial cues for object recognition. Percept Psychophys
6. Corbeil J-C, Archarnbault A, (Eds): The McMillian Visual Dictionary New York: Macmillan; 1992.
7. Hemera Photo Objects v. 1 Available as a web-based order at many sites, including http://www.amazon.com
8. Schall R: Estimation in generalized linear models with random effects. Biometrika 1991, 40:917-927.
9. Graham CH, Margaria R: Area and intensity time relation in the peripheral retina. Amer J Physiol 1935, 113:299-305.
10. Barlow HB: Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities. J Physiol 1958, 141:337-350 1358805 13539843
11. Savage GL: Temporal summation for grating patches detected at low light levels. Optom Vision Science 1996, 73:404-412.
12. Warrant EJ: SeeingLbetter at night: life style, eye design and the optimum strategy of spatial and temporal summation. Vision Res 1999, 39:1611-1630. 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00262-4 10343855
13. Efron R: The relation between the duration of a stimulus and the duration of a perception. Neuropsychologia 1970, 8:37-55. 10.1016/ 0028-3932(70)90024-2 5522546
14. Coltheart M: Iconic memory and visible persistence. Percept Psychophys 1980, 27:183-228. 6992093
15. Long GM: Iconic memory: A review and critique of the study of short-term visual storage. Psychol Bull 1980, 88:785-820. 10.1037/ 0033-2909.88.3.785 7003642
16. Nisly SJ, Wasserman GS: Intensity dependence of perceived duration: Data, theories, and neural integration. Psychol Bull 1989, 106:483-496. 10.1037/0033-2909.106.3.483 2682721
17. Di Lollo V, Bischof WF: Inverse-intensity effect in duration of visible persistence. Percept Psychophys 1995, 118:223-237.
18. Greene E: Simultaneity in the millisecond range as a requirement for effective shape recognition. Behav Brain Funct 2006, 2:38. 1693915 17134493 10.1186/1744-9081-2-38
19. Loftus GR, Hanna AM: The phenomenoloDy of spatial integration: data and models. Cognit Psychol 1989, 21:363-397. 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90013-3 2758785
20. Erwin DE, Herschenson M: Functional characteristics of visual persistence predicted by a two-factor theory of backward masking. J Exp Psychol 1974, 103:249-254. 10.1037/h0036800
21. Erwin DE: Further evidence for two components in visual persistence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1976, 2:191-209. 10.1037/ 0096-1523.2.2.191 1271027
22. Irwin DE, Yeomans JM: Duration of visible persistence in relation to stimulus complexity. Percept Psychophys 1991, 50: 475-489. 1788036
23. Hogben JH, Di Lollo V: Perceptual integration and perceptual segregation of brief visual stimuli. Vision Res 1974, 14:1059-1069. 10.1016/ 0042-6989(74)90202-8 4428612