What determines exit from social assistance in Spain?

International Journal of Social Welfare

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 168-182

  Ayala, Luis ^a,b   Rodríguez, Magdalena ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^b Instituto de Estudios Fiscales   (Spain)

Author keywords

Poverty; Social assistance; Spain; Survival analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947715162     PISSN: 13696866     EISSN: 14682397     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2006.00455.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Andren T, Gustafsson B (2004). Patterns of social assistance receipt in Sweden. International Journal of Social Welfare 13: 55-68.
2. Ayala L, Martínez R, Ruiz-Huerta J (2005). La descentralización de las prestaciones asistenciales: Efectos sobre la igualdad [Decentralization of Social Assistance and Income Inequality]. In: Ruiz-Huerta J, ed. Políticas públicas y distribución de la renta [Public policies and income distribution]. Bilbao, Fundación BBVA.
3. Ayala L, Pérez C (2005). Macroeconomic Conditions, Institutional Factors and Demographic Structure: What Causes Welfare Caseloads? Journal of Population Economics 18: 563-581.
4. Bane MJ, Ellwood DT (1994). Welfare Realities. From Rhetoric to Reform. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
5. Blank R (2002). Evaluating Welfare Reform in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature 40: 1105-1166.
6. Cox D, Oakes D (1984). Analysis of Survival Data. London, Chapman & Hall.
7. Dahl E, Lorentzen T (2003). Dynamics of social assistance: The Norwegian experience in comparative perspective. International Journal of Social Welfare 12: 289-301.
8. Eardley T, Bradshaw J, Ditch J, Gough I (1996). Social Assistance Schemes in OECD Countries. London, Department of Social Security.
9. Goerge R, Lee B (2001). Matching and Cleaning Administrative Data. In: Ver Ploeg M, Moffitt R, Citro C, eds. Studies of Welfare Population: Data Collection and Research Issues. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
10. Gottschalk P, Moffitt R (1994). Welfare Dependence: Concepts, Measures and Trends. American Economic Review 84: 38-42.
11. Grogger J, Karoly L, Klerman J (2002). Consequences of Welfare Reform: A Research Synthesis. Working Paper DRU-2676-DHSS, RAND.
12. HeikkiläM, Keskitalo E, Puide A, Fridberg T, Hanesch W, Stelzer-Orthofer C, Kazepov Y, Ayala L (2001). Social Assistance in Europe. A Comparative Study of Minimum Income in Seven European Countries. STAKES-European Commission.
13. Hills J, Waldfogel J (2004). A 'Third Way' in Welfare Reform? Evidence from the United Kingdom? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23: 765-788.
14. Leibfried S (1992). Towards a European Welfare State? On Integrating Poverty Regimes Into the European Community. In: Ferge Z, Kolbert JI, eds. Social Policy in a Changing Europe. Boulder, CO, Westview Press.
15. Mainieri T, Danziger S (2001). Designing Surveys of Welfare Populations. Report from the Workshop on Designing Surveys of Welfare Recipients. Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan, Center on Poverty, Risk and Mental Health.
16. Moffit R, Ver Ploeg M, eds. (2001). Evaluating Welfare Reform in an Era of Transition. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
17. Saarela J (2004). How unemployment duration affects social assistance receipt: Evidence from Finland. International Journal of Social Welfare 13(3): 223-232.
18. Walker R, Wiseman M (2003). The welfare we want? Bristol, The Policy Press.