Field testing of an enhanced direct-fecal polymerase chain reaction procedure, bacterial culture of feces, and a serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis infection in adult dairy cattle

American Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 236-245

  Scott, H Morgan ^a   Fosgate, Geoffrey T ^a   Libal, Melissa C ^a,b   Sneed, Lloyd W ^b   Erol, Erdal ^b   Angulo, Arthur B ^b   Jordan, Ellen R ^c  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM   (United States)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BAYES THEOREM; BLOOD SAMPLING; CATTLE DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAIRY CATTLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DNA EXTRACTION; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FECES CULTURE; FEMALE; FIELD STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MYCOBACTERIOSIS; MYCOBACTERIUM PARATUBERCULOSIS; NONHUMAN; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEASONAL VARIATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALS; BACTERIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FECES; FEMALE; MYCOBACTERIUM PARATUBERCULOSIS; PARATUBERCULOSIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEASONS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BOS; MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM;

EID: 33947699937     PISSN: 00029645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.68.3.236     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Whitlock RH, Buergelt C. Preclinical and clinical manifestations of paratuberculosis (including pathology). Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 1996;12:345-356.
2. National Animal Health Monitoring System. Johne's disease on US dairy operations. Fort Collins, Colo: USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 1997.
3. Johnson-Ifearulundu YJ, Kaneene JB, Sprecher DJ, et al. The effect of subclinical Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection on days open in Michigan, USA, dairy cows. Prev Vet Med 2000;46:171-181.
4. Strickland SJ, Scott HM, Libal MC, et al. Effects of seasonal climatic conditions on the diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in daily cattle. J Dairy Sci 2005;88:2432-2440.
5. Hermon-Taylor J, Bull TJ, Sheridan JM, et al. Causation of Crohn's disease by Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Can J Gastroenterol 2000;14:521-539.
6. Van Kruiningen HJ. Lack of support for a common etiology in Johne's disease of animals and Crohn's disease in humans. Inflamm Bowel Dis 1999;5:183-191.
7. Kennedy DJ, Benedictus G. Control of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis infection in agricultural species. Rev Sci Tech 2001;20:151-179.
8. Whittington RJ, Sergeant ES. Progress towards understanding the spread, detection and control of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in animal populations. Aust Vet J 2001;79:267-278.
9. Dargatz DA, Byrum BA, Barber LK, et al. Evaluation of a commercial ELISA for diagnosis of paratuberculosis in cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;218:1163-1166.
10. Nielsen SS, Gronbaek C, Agger JF, et al. Maximum-likelihood estimation of sensitivity and specificity of ELISAs and faecal culture for diagnosis of paratuberculosis. Prev Vet Med 2002;53:191-204.
11. Collins MT, Sockett DC, Ridge S, et al. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Johne's disease. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:272-276.
12. Jordan D. Aggregate testing for the evaluation of Johne's disease herd status. Aust Vet J 1996;73:16-19.
13. Kalis CH, Hesselink JW, Barkema HW, et al. Culture of strategically pooled bovine fecal samples as a method to screen herds for paratuberculosis. J Vet Diagn Invest 2000;12:547-551.
14. Wells SJ, Whitlock RH, Lindeman CJ, et al. Evaluation of bacteriologic culture of pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Am J Vet Res 2002;63:1207-1211.
15. van Schaik C, Stehman SM, Schukken YH, et al. Pooled fecal culture sampling for Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis at different herd sizes and prevalence. J Vet Diagn Invest 2003;15:233-241.
16. Wells SJ, Godden SM, Lindeman CJ, et al. Evaluation of bacteriologic culture of individual and pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in dairy cattle herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;223:1022-1025.
17. Kalis CHJ, Collins MT, Barkema HW, et al. Certification of herds as free of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection: actual pooled faecal results versus certification model predictions. Prev Vet Med 2004;65:189-204.
18. Tavornpanich S, Gardner IA, Anderson RJ, et al. Evaluation of microbial culture of pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in large dairy herds. Am J Vet Res 2004;65:1061-1070.
19. Chui LW, King R, Lu P, et al. Evaluation of four DNA extraction methods for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2004;48:39-45.
20. Stabel JR, Bosworth TL, Kirkbride TA, et al. A simple, rapid, and effective method for the extraction of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis DNA from fecal samples for polymerase chain reaction. J Vet Diagn Invest 2004;16:22-30.
21. Khare S, Ficht TA, Santos RL, et al. Rapid and sensitive detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in bovine milk and feces by a combination of immunomagnetic bead separation-conventional PCR and real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:1075-1081.
22. Stabel JR. An improved method for cultivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal samples and comparison to three other methods. J Vet Diagn Invest 1997;9:375-380.
23. Joseph L, Gyorkos TW, Coupal L. Bayesian-estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic-tests in the absence of a gold standard. Am J Epidemiol 1995;141:263-272.
24. Enoe C, Georgiadis MP, Johnson WO. Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown. Prev Vet Med 2000;45:61-81.
25. Dendukuri N, Joseph L. Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests. Biometrics 2001;57:158-167.
26. Fosgate GT, Adesiyun AA, Hird DW, et al. Comparison of serologic tests for detection of Brucella infections in cattle and water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Am J Vet Res 2002;63:1598-1605.
27. Hui SL, Walter SD. Estimating the error rates of diagnostic-tests. Biometrics 1980;36:167-171.
28. Johnson WO, Gastwirth JL, Pearson LM. Screening without a "gold standard": the Hui-Walter paradigm revisited. Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:921-924.
29. Vacek PM. The effect of conditional dependence on the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 1985;41:959-968.
30. Gardner IA, Stryhn H, Lind P, et al. Conditional dependence between tests affects the diagnosis and surveillance of animal diseases. Prev Vet Med 2000;45:107-122.
31. Collins MT, Wells SJ, Petrini KR, et al. Evaluation of five antibody detection tests for diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2005;12:685-692.
32. Kalis CH, Hesselink JW, Russchen EW, et al. Factors influencing the isolation of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis from bovine fecal samples. J Vet Diagn Invest 1999;11:345-351.
33. Nielsen SS, Enevoldsen C, Grohn YT. The Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis ELISA response by parity and stage of lactation. Prev Vet Med 2002;54:1-10.