Virtual reality simulation in carotid stenting: A new paradigm for procedural training

Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 174-175

  Cates, Christopher U ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAROTID ARTERY SURGERY; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CERTIFICATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; PATIENT SAFETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK REDUCTION; SIMULATOR; STENT; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; VALIDATION PROCESS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

BALLOON DILATATION; CAROTID STENOSIS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33947698867     PISSN: 17434297     EISSN: 17434300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncpcardio0837     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Yadav JS et al. for the Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy Investigators (2004) Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351: 1493-1501
2. Gallagher AG and Cates CU (2004) Virtual reality training for the operating room and cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Lancet 364: 1538-1540
3. Gallagher AG and Cates CU (2004) Approval of virtual reality training for carotid stenting: What this means for procedural-based medicine. JAMA 292: 3024-3026
4. Rosenfield K et al. (2005) Clinical competence statement on carotid stenting: Training and credentialing for carotid stenting-multispecialty consensus recommendations: A report of the SCAI/SVMB/SVS Writing Committee to develop a clinical competence statement on carotid interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 45: 165-174
5. Patel AD et al. (2006) Learning curves and reliability measures for virtual reality simulation in the performance assessment of carotid angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 1796-1802
6. Satava RM (1993) Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps. Surg Endosc 7:203-205
7. Seymour NE et al. (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: Results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236: 458-463
8. Cates CU et al. (2005) Simulator training validation: Preliminary results from the STRIVE (Simulator Training Randomized Versus Invasive Vascular Experience) study [abstract #2624]. Presented at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions: 2005 November 13-16, Dallas, TX, USA
9. Patel AD et al. (2006) Construct validation for carotid artery stenting [poster 2904-61]. Presented at the American College of Cardiology i2 Summit: 2006 March 11-14. Atlanta, GA, USA
10. Nicholson WJ et al. (2006) Face and content validation of virtual reality simulation for carotid angiography: Results from the first 100 physicians attending the Emory NeuroAnatomy Carotid Training (ENACT) Program. Simulation in Healthcare 1: 147-150
11. Cates CU et al. (2007) Use of virtual reality simulation for mission rehearsal for carotid stenting. JAMA 297: 265-266