DNA markers and morphometry reveal multiclonal and poorly defined taxa in an apomictic Cotoneaster species complex

Taxon

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 119-128

  Nybom, Hilde ^a   Bartish, Igor V ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Apomixis; Cotoneaster; DNA marker; Morphometry; RAPD; Rosaceae

Indexed keywords

APOMIXIS; DNA; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC MARKER; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; SHRUB; SPECIES COMPLEX; TAXONOMY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

COTONEASTER; COTONEASTER INTEGERRIMUS; ROSACEAE;

EID: 33947697974     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Arumuganathan, K. & Earle, E.D. 1991. Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow cytometry. Pl. Molec. Biol. Rep. 9: 229-233.
2. Asker, S.E. & Jerling, L. 1992. Apomixis in Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
3. Barcaccia, G., Arzenton, F., Sharbel, T.F., Varotto, S., Parrini, P. & Lucchin, M. 2006. Genetic diversity and reproductive biology in ecotypes of the facultative apomict Hypericum perforatum L. Heredity 96: 322-334.
4. Bartish, I.V., Hylmö, B. & Nybom, H. 2001. RAPD analysis of interspecific relationships in presumably apomictic Cotoneaster species. Euphytica 120: 273-280.
5. Bengtsson, B.O. 2003. Genetic variation in organisms with sexual and asexual reproduction. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 189-199.
6. Bicknell, R.A., Lambie, S.C. & Butler, R.C. 2003. Quantification of progeny classes in two facultatively apomictic accessions of Hieracium. Hereditas 138: 11-20.
7. Campbell, C.S. 1999. The evolutionary role of hybridisation in angiosperm agamic complexes, with special emphasis on Amelanchier (Rosaceae). Pp. 340-357 in: Van Raamsdonk, L.W.D. & den Nijs, J.C.M. (eds.), Plant Evolution in Man-Made Habitats. Hugo de Vries Laboratory, Amsterdam.
8. Campbell, C.S., Alice, L.A. & Wright, W.A. 1997. Comparisons of within-population genetic variation in sexual and agamospermous Amelanchier (Rosaceae) using RAPD markers. Pl. Syst. Evol. 215: 157-167.
9. Dickinson, T.A. 1999. Species concept in agamic complexes. Pp. 319-339 in: Van Raamsdonk, L.W.D. & den Nijs, J.C.M. (eds.), Plant Evolution in Man-Made Habitats. Hugo de Vries Laboratory, Amsterdam.
10. Favarger, C. 1969. Notes de caryologie alpine V. Bull. Soc. Neuchâteloise Sci. Nat. 92: 13-30.
11. Favarger, C. 1971. Relation entre de la flore mé diterranéenne et celle des enclaves à végétation subméditerranéenne d'Europe centrale. Boissiera 19: 149-168.
12. Flinck, K.E. & Hylmö, B. 1966. A list of series and species in the genus Cotoneaster. Bot. Notiser 119: 445-463.
13. Gamier, K.M., Durand, J. & Dajoz, I. 2002. Limited seed dispersal and microspatial population structure of an agamospermous grass of West African savannahs, Hyparrhenia diplandra (Poaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1785-1791.
14. Hjelmqvist, H. 1962. The embryo sac development of some Cotoneaster species. Bot. Not. 115: 208-236.
15. Houliston, G.J. & Chapman, H.M. 2004. Reproductive strategy and population variability in the facultative apomict Hieracium pilosella (Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 91: 37-44.
16. Hylmö, B. 1993. Oxbär, Cotoneaster, i Sverige [Cotoneaster in Sweden]. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 87: 305-330.
17. Hylmö, B. & Fryer, J. 1999. Cotoneasters in Europe. Acta Bot. Fenn. 162: 179-184.
18. Horandl, E. 1998. Species concepts in agamic complexes: applications in the Ranunculus auricomus complex and general perspectives. Folia Geobot. 33: 335-348.
19. Horandl, E. 2006. The complex causality of geographical parthenogenesis. New Phytol. 171: 525-538.
20. Kosman, E. & Leonard, K.J. 2005. Similarity coefficients for molecular markers in studies of genetic relationships between individuals for haploid, diploid and polyploid species. Molec. Ecol. 14: 415-424.
21. Kraft, T., Nybom, H. & Werlemark, G. 1996. DNA fingerprint variation in some apomictic blackberry species (Rubus subg. Rubus, Rosaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 199: 93-108.
22. Krügel, T. 1992. Zur zytologischen Struktur der Gattung Cotoneaster III. Phytotaxonomie 15: 69-86.
23. Mes, T.H.M., Kuperus, P., Kirschner, J., Stepanek, J., Storchova, H., Oosterveld, P. & den Nijs, H.C.M. 2002. Detection of genetically divergent clone mates in apomictic dandelions. Molec. Ecol. 11: 253-265.
24. Meyer, M.M. 1988. Rest and postdormancy of seeds of Cotoneaster species. HortScience 23: 1046-1047.
25. Noyes, R.D. & Soltis, D.E. 1996. Genotypic variation in agamospermous Erigeron compositus (Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 83: 1292-1303.
26. Nybom, H. 1988. Apomixis and sexuality in blackberries (Rubus subgen. Rubus). Pl. Syst. Evol. 160: 207-218.
27. Nybom, H. 1998. Biometry and DNA fingerprinting detect limited genetic differentiation among populations of the apomictic blackberry Rubus nessensis (Rosaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 18: 323-333.
28. Nybom, H. 2004. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Molec. Ecol. 13: 1143-1155.
29. Phipps, J.B., Robertson, K.R., Smith, P.G. & Rohrer, R. 1990. A checklist of the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 68: 2209-2269.
30. Ploompuu, T. 1999. Eesti kodumaised tuhkpuud [Native Cotoneasters of Estonia]. Pp: 38-52, 53-54 in: Sander, H. (ed.), Dendroloogilised uurimused Eestis I [Dendrological researches in Estonia]. Metsanduslik Uurimisinstituut [EAU Forest Research Institute], Tallinn.
31. Reisch, C. 2004. Molecular differentiation between coexisting species of Taraxacum sect. Erythrosperma (Asteraceae) from populations in south-east and west Germany. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 145: 109-117.
32. Ritz, C.M., Schmuths, H. & Wissemann, V. 2005. Evolution by reticulation: European dogroses originated by multiple hybridization across the genus Rosa. J. Heredity 96: 4-14.
33. Rohlf, F.J. 1996. NTSYS-pc. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Ver. 1.80. Exeter Publ., Setauket.
34. Sax, H.J. 1954. Polyploidy and apomixis in Cotoneaster. J. Arnold Arbor. 35: 334-365.
35. Stace, C.A., Gornall, R.J. & Ying, S. 1997. Cytological and molecular variation in apomictic Hieracium sect. Alpina. Opera Bot. 132: 39-51.
36. Storchova, H., Chrtek, J., Jr., Bartish, I.V., Tetera, M., Kirschner, J. & Stepanek, J. 2002. Genetic variation in agamospermous taxa of Hieracium sect. Alpina (Compositae) in the Tatry Mts. (Slovakia). Pl. Syst. Evol. 235: 1-17.
37. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland.
38. Talent, N. & Dickinson, T.A. In press. Apomixis and hybridization in Rosaceae subtribe Pyrineae Dumort: a new tool promises new insights. In: Grossniklaus, U., van Dijk, P., Sharbel, T. & Hörandl, E. (eds.), Apomixis: Evolution, Mechanisms and Perspectives. Koeltz, Königstein
39. [Regnum Veg. 147]
40. Weising, K., Nybom, H., Wolf, K. & Kahl, G. 2005. DNA Fingerprinting in Plants: Principles, Methods and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
41. Zeilinga, A.E. 1964. Polyploidy in Cotoneaster. Bot. Not. 117: 262-278.