EHRs fix everything - and nine other myths

Family Practice Management

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 26-30

  Trachtenbarg, David E ^a,b  

^a Methodist Medical Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION MAKING; GENERAL PRACTICE; GROUP PRACTICE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; LITERATURE; MEDICAL RECORD; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; REVIEW; STANDARD;

AMBULATORY CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY PRACTICE; GROUP PRACTICE; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MYTHOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 33947693713     PISSN: 10695648     EISSN: 15311929     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (4)

1. Mitchell E, Sullivan F. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97. BMJ. 2001;322(7281):279-282.
2. Collins J. Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap ... and Others Don't. New York, NY: Harpercollins Publishers Inc.; 2001.
3. Waegemann CP, Tessier C, Barbash A, et al, for the consensus Workgroup on Health Information capture and report generation. Healthcare documentation: a report on information capture and report generation. Boston, Mass: Medical records Institute; June 2002. available at: http://www.medrecinst.com/pages/ libarticle.asp?id=39. accessed Feb. 1, 2007.
4. Tai SS, Nazareth I, Donegan C, Haines A. Evaluation of general practice computer templates: lessons from a pilot randomised controlled trial. Methods Inf Med. 1999;38:177-181.