The effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis)

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society

Volumn 104, Issue , 2006, Pages 366-401

  Durrie, Daniel S ^a  

^a Durrie Vision   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; PHOTOPIC VISION; PRESBYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; AGED; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICS; PRESBYOPIA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33947680718     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15456110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Donders FC. On the Anomalies of Accommodation and Refraction of the Eye. London: The New Sydenham Society; 1864:10-27.
2. Duane A. Normal values of the accommodation at all ages. Trans Sect Ophthalmol AMA 1912:365-391.
3. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Optics, refraction, and contact lenses. In: Basic and Clinical Science Course. Section 3. San Francisco: AAO; 2003:151.
4. Murube J, Barraquer MJ, Fukasaku H, et al. Treatment of presbyopia. In: Murube J, ed. Amphimetropia versus Presbyopia. Madrid: Rizal; 2001:41-63.
5. Weale RA. Epidemiology of refractive errors and presbyopia. Surv Ophthalmol 2003;48:515-543.
6. US Census Bureau. Selected social characteristics of baby boomers 26 to 44 years old: 1990. Available at: www.census.gov/population/censusdata/cph-1- 160h.txt.
7. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Witt K, et al. Blindness and visual impairment in an American urban population. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:286-290.
8. Katz J, Tielsch JM, Sommer A. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in an adult inner city population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:334-340.
9. McDonnell PJ, Lee P, Spritzer K, et al. Association of presbyopia with vision-targeted health-related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1577-1581.
10. Wright KW, Guemes A, Kapadia MS, et al. Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by myopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:177-182.
11. Vinciguerra P, Nizzola GM, Bailo G, et al. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for presbyopia: 24-month follow-up in three eyes. J Refract Surg 1998;14:31-37.
12. Cantu R, Rosales MA, Tepichin E, et al. Objective quality of vision in presbyopic and non-presbyopic patients after pseudoaccommodative advanced surface ablation. J Refract Surg 2005;21:S603-605.
13. Telandro A. Pseudo-accommodative cornea: a new concept for correction of presbyopia. J Refract Surg 2004;20:S714-717.
14. Cheng AC, Lam DS. Monovision LASIK for pre-presbyopic and presbyopic patients. J Refract Surg 2005;21:411-412.
15. Miranda D, Krueger RR. Monovision laser in situ keratomileusis for pre-presbyopic and presbyopic patients. J Refract Surg 2004;20:325-328.
16. Hom MM. Monovision and LASIK. J Am Optom Assoc 1999;70:117-122.
17. Jain S, Ou R, Azar DT. Monovision outcomes in presbyopic individuals after refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1430-1433.
18. Sippel KC, Jain S, Azar DT. Monovision achieved with excimer laser refractive surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2001;41:91-101.
19. Goldberg DB. Laser in situ keratomileusis monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1449-1455.
20. Epstein D, Vincinguerra P, Frueh BE. Correction of presbyopia with the excimer laser. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2001;41:103-111.
21. Qazi MA, Pepose JS, Shuster JJ. Implantation of scleral expansion band segments for the treatment of presbyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:808-815.
22. Baikoff GF. Presbyopic phakic intraocular lenses. In: Agarwal A, ed. Presbyopia: A Surgical Textbook. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc; 2002;225-228.
23. Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Nubile M, et al. Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1307-1312.
24. Cumming JS, Slade SG, Chayet A; AT-45 Study Group. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens: results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology 2001;108:2005-2009.
25. McDonald MB, Durrie DS, Asbell PA, et al. Treatment of presbyopia with conductive keratoplasty: six-month results of the United States FDA clinical trial. Cornea 2004;23:661-668.
26. Peyre C, Fumery L, Gatinel D. Comparison of high-order optical aberrations induced by different multifocal contact lens geometries. J Fr Ophtalmol 2005;28:599-604.
27. Patel S, Fakhry M, Alio JL. Objective assessment of aberrations induced by multifocal contact lenses in vivo. CLAO J 2002;28:196-201.
28. Westsmith RA. Uses of a monocular contact lens. Am J Ophthalmol 1958;46:78-81.
29. Daniels K. Contact lens alternatives for presbyopia. In: Agarwal A, ed. Presbyopia. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc; 2002:71-85.
30. Schor C, Landsman L, Erickson P. Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:723-730.
31. Schor C, Carson M, Peterson G, et al. Effects of interocular blur suppression ability on monovision task performance. J Am Optom Assoc 1989;60:188-192.
32. Robboy MW, Cox IG, Erickson P. Effects of sighting and sensory dominance on monovision high and low contrast visual acuity. CLAO J 1990;16:299-301.
33. Jain S, Ou R, Azar DT. Monovision outcomes in presbyopic individuals after refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1430-1433.
34. Trevarthen CB. Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychol Forsch 1968;31:299-348.
35. McGill EC, Erickson P. Sighting dominance and monovision distance binocular fusion ranges. J Am Optom Assoc 1991;62:738-742.
36. Collins M, Goode A. Interocular blur suppression and monovision. Acta Ophthalmol 1994;72:376-380.
37. Jain S, Arora I, Azar DT. Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 1996;40:491-499.
38. Harris MG, Sheedy JE, Gan CM. Vision and task performance with monovision and diffractive bifocal contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:609-614.
39. Koetting RA. Stereopsis in presbyopes fitted with single vision contact lenses. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1970;47:557-561.
40. McGill E, Erickson P. Stereopsis in presbyopes wearing monovision and simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:619-26.
41. Erickson P, Schor C. Visual function with presbyopic lens correction. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:723-728.
42. Larson WL, Bodic M. Effect of induced blur on visual acuity and stereoacuity. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:294-298.
43. Fawcett SL, Herman WK, Alfieri CD. Stereoacuity and foveal fusion in adults with long-standing surgical monovision. J AAPOS 2001;5:342-347.
44. Emmes AB. A statistical study of clinical scores obtained in the Wirt stereopsis test. Am J Optom 1961;38:398-400.
45. Glasser A, Campbell MCW. Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age. Vision Res 1998;38:209-229.
46. Artal P, Berrio E, Guiaro A, Navarro R. Contribution of the cornea and internal surface to the change in ocular aberrations with age. J Opt Soc Am 2002;19:137-143.
47. El Hage SG, Berny F. Contribution of the crystalline lens to the spherical aberration of the eye. J Opt Soc Am 1973;63:205-211.
48. Artal P, Guiaro A, Berrio E, Williams DR. Compensation of corneal aberrations by the internal optics in the human eye. J Vision 2001;1:1-8.
49. Wang L, Wang N, Koch DD. Evaluation of the refractive error measurements of the Wavescan wavefront system and the Tracey wavefront system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:970-979.
50. Netto MV, Ambrosio R Jr, Shen TT, Wilson SE. Wavefront analysis in normal refractive surgery candidates. J Refract Surg 2005;21:332-338.
51. Chalita MR, Krueger RR. Correlation of aberrations with visual acuity and symptoms. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2004;17:135-142.