What you don't know can hurt you: Factors impacting diagnosis in the automated cockpit

Human Factors

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 300-310

  Mosier, Kathleen L ^a   Sethi, Nikita ^a   McCauley, Shane ^a   Khoo, Len ^a   Orasanu, Judith M ^b  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

AUTOMATED COCKPITS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCESSES;

COCKPITS (AIRCRAFT);

ACCURACY; AIRCRAFT; AIRPLANE PILOT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; AVIATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH; INFORMATION SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY; TIME;

AIRCRAFT; AUTOMATION; AVIATION; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; HUMANS; INTERNET; PROBLEM SOLVING; SAFETY; TECHNOLOGY; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33947669358     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872007X312513     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Brunswik, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50, 255-272.
2. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Cooksey, R. W. (1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods, and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Corwin, W. H., Funk, H., Levitan, L., & Bloomfield, J. (1993). Flight crew information requirements (Contractor Rep. DTFA-91-C-00040). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
5. Fischer, U., Orasanu, J., & Montalvo, M. (1993). Efficient decision strategies on the flight deck. In Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 238-243). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
6. Hamilton, D. L. (1981). Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Hammond, K. R. (1996a). How convergence of research paradigms can improve research on diagnostic judgment. Medical Decision Making, 16, 281-287.
8. Hammond, K. R. (1996b). Human judgment and social policy. New York: Oxford Press.
9. Hammond, K. R. (2000). Judgments under stress. New York: Oxford Press.
10. Jacobson, C., & Mosier, K. L. (2004). Coherence and correspondence decision making in aviation: A study of pilot incident reports. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 4, 123-134.
11. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economics Review, 93, 1449-1475.
12. Klein, G. (1993). Recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 103-147). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Klein, G. (2000). Decision skills training for the aviation community. In Proceedings of the Fifth Australian Aviation Psychology Symposium [CD-ROM]. Aldershot, Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
14. Maule, A. J., Hockey, G. R. J., & Bdzola, L. (2000). Effects of time-pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: Changes in affective state and information processing strategy. Acta Psychologica, 104, 283-301.
15. Maurino, D. E. (2000). Human factors and aviation safety: What the industry has, what the industry needs. Ergonomics, 43, 952-959.
16. Ministère de l'Equipement, des Transports et du Tourisme. (1993). Rapport de la Commission d'Enquête sur l'accident survenu le 20 janvier 1992 près du Mont Sainte Odile (Bas Rhin) à l'Airbus A320 immatriculé F-GGED exploité par la Compagnie Air Inter [Report of the Commission of Inquiry concerning the accident on January 20, 1992, near Mont Sainte Odile (Bas-Rhine), involving Airbus A320 with the registration number F-GGED and operated by Air Inter, Paris]. Paris: Author.
17. Mosier, K. (1991). Expert decision-making strategies. In R. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology [CD-ROM]. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
18. Mosier, K. L. (2002). Automation and cognition: Maintaining coherence in the electronic cockpit. In E. Salas (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research (pp. 93-121). New York: Elsevier Sciences.
19. Mosier, K. L., Keyes, J., & Bernhard, R. (2003). Dealing with conflicting information: Will crews rely on automation? In G. Edkins & P. Pfister (Eds.), Innovation and consolidation in aviation: Selected contributions to the Australian Aviation Psychology Symposium 2000 (pp. 243-254). Aldershot, Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
20. Mosier, K. L., Skitka, L. J., Dunbar, M., & McDonnell, L. (2001). Air crews and automation bias: The advantages of teamwork? International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11, 1-14.
21. Mosier, K. L., Skitka, L. J., Heers, S., & Burdick, M. D. (1998). Automation bias: Decision making and performance in high-tech cockpits. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 47-63.
22. Orasanu, J., & Fischer, U. (1997). Finding decisions in natural environments: The view from the cockpit. In C. Zsambok & G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making (pp. 343-348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Parasuraman, R., & Mouloua, M. (1996). Automation and human performance: Theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
25. Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1994). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation: II. An experimental study of pilots' model and awareness of the flight management system. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 1-28.
26. Sarter, N. B., Woods, D. D., & Billings, C. (1997). Automation surprises. In G. Savendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors/ergonomics (2nd ed., pp. 1926-1943). New York: Wiley.
27. Skitka, L. J. (1999). Automation: Decision aid or decision maker? (NASA Contractor Rep.). Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
28. Skitka, L. J., Mosier, K., & Burdick, M. (2000). Accountability and automation bias. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 701-717.
29. Skitka, L. J., Mosier, K., Burdick, M., & Rosenblatt, B. (2000). Automation bias and errors: Are crews better than individuals? International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10, 83-95.
30. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
31. Vicente, K. J. (1990). Coherence- and correspondence-driven work domains: Implications for systems design. Behavior and Information Technology, 9, 493-502.
32. Wickens, C. D., & Flach, J. M. (1988). Information processing. In E. L. Wiener & D. C. Nagel (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 111-156). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33. Woods, D. D. (1996). Decomposing automation: Apparent simplicity, real complexity. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 3-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Woods, D. D., & Sarter, N. B. (2000). Learning from automation surprises and "going sour" accidents. In N. B. Sarter & R. Amalberti (Eds.), Cognitive engineering in the aviation domain (pp. 327-353). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.