Sound survey designs can facilitate integrating stream monitoring data across multiple programs

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 384-397

  Larsen, David P ^a   Olsen, Anthony R ^a   Lanigan, Steven H ^a   Moyer, Chris ^a   Jones, Kim K ^a   Kincaid, Thomas M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Monitoring; Rivers streams; Statistics; Stream condition; Stream surveys; Watershed condition

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; DATA REDUCTION; RIVERS; STATISTICAL METHODS; WATERSHEDS;

STREAM CONDITION; STREAM SURVEYS; WATERSHED CONDITION;

WATER ANALYSIS;

DATA ACQUISITION; DATA REDUCTION; RIVERS; STATISTICAL METHODS; WATER ANALYSIS; WATERSHEDS;

DATA ACQUISITION; DIGITAL MAP; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; INTEGRATED APPROACH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STREAM CHANNEL; SURVEY DESIGN; WATERSHED;

EID: 33947668816     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00030.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ator, S.W., A.R. Olsen, A.M. Pitchford, and J.M. Denver, 2003. Application of a Multipurpose Unequal Probability Stream Survey in the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39(4):872-885.
2. Birdsey, R.A. and H.T. Schreuder, 1992. An Overview of Forest Inventory and Analysis Estimation Procedures in the Eastern United States - With an Emphasis on Components of Change. Gen. Tech. Rept. RM-214, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ft. Collins, Colorado (FIA point sample).
3. Cochran, W.G., 1987. Sampling Techniques, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 428 pp.
4. Converse, J.M., 1987. Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence 1890-1960. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 564 pp.
5. Cotter, J. and J. Nealon, 1987. Area Frame Design for Agricultural Surveys. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, District of Columbia.
6. Cressie, N., 1991. Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley & Sons. New York.
7. Detenbeck, N.E., D. Cincotta, J.M. Denver, S.K. Greenlee, A.R. Olsen, and A.M. Pitchford, 2005. Watershed-based Survey Designs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 103:59-81.
8. Forest Health Monitoring Program (FHM). 1994. Forest Health Monitoring: a National Strategic Plan. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 254 pp.
9. Gallo, K., S.H. Lanigan, P. Eldred, S.N. Gordon, and C. Moyer, 2005. Northwest Forest Plan - The First 10 Years (1994-2003): Preliminary Assessment of the Condition of Watersheds. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-647. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon. 133 pp.
10. Herlihy, A.T., D.P. Larsen, S.G. Paulsen, N.S. Urquhart, and B.J. Rosenbaum, 2000. Designing a Spatially Balanced Randomized Site Selection Process for Regional Stream Surveys -The EMAP Mid-Atlantic Pilot Study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 63:95-113.
11. Johnson, D.H., N. Pittman, E. Wilder, J.A. Silver, R.W. Plotnikoff, B.C. Mason, K.K. Jones, P. Roger, T.A. O'Neil, and C. Barrett, 2001. Inventory and Monitoring of Salmon Habitat in the Paci-fic Northwest - Directory and Synthesis of Protocols for Management/Research and Volunteers in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington, 212 pp.
12. Jones, K.K. and K.M.S. Moore, 1999. Habitat Assessment in Coastal Basins in Oregon: Implications for Coho Salmon Production and Habitat Restoration. In: Sustainable Fisheries Management, E.E. Knudsen, C.R. Steward, D.D. McDonald, J.E. Williams, and D.W. Riser (Editors). CRC Press, New York, pp. 329-340.
13. Kish, L., 1965. Survey Sampling. Wiley, New York.
14. Lazorchak J.M., D.J. Klemm, and D.V. Peck (Editors), 1998. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program - Surface Waters: Field Operations and Methods for Measuring the Ecological Condition of Wadeable Streams. EPA/620/R-94/004F. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, District of Columbia. 211 pp. plus appendices.
15. Legleiter, K.J., 2001. Interagency Development of National Watershed and Subwatershed Hydrologic Units. Paper 492. In: Proceedings, 2001 ESRI International User's Conference, July 9-13, 2001. San Diego, California.
16. Lohr, S.L., 1999. Sampling: Design and Analysis. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, California.
17. Montgomery, D.R., G.E. Grant, and K. Sullivan, 1995. Watershed Analysis as a Framework for Implementing Ecosystem Management. Water Resources Bulletin 31:369-386.
18. Moore, K.M.S., K.K. Jones and J.M. Dambacher, 1997. Methods for Stream Habitat Surveys. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Information Report 97-4, Salem, Oregon, 40 pp.
19. Nicholas, J.W., 1997. The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds: Oregon Coastal Salmon Restoration Initiative. State of Oregon, Salem, Oregon.
20. Olsen, A.R., J. Sedransk, E. Edwards, C.A. Gotway, and W. Liggett, 1999. Statistical Issues for Monitoring Ecological and Natural Resources in the United States. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 54:1-45.
21. Omernik, J.M., 2003. The Misuse of the Hydrologic Unit Maps for Extrapolation, Reporting and Ecosystem Management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39:563-573.
22. Oregon Plan, 1997. The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds (Consisting of the Oregon Coastal Salmon Restoration Initiative, March 10, 1997 and as Amended with the Steelhead Supplement, December 1997). Governor's Natural Resources Office, State of Oregon, Salem, Oregon.
23. Overton, J.M., T.C. Young, and W.S. Overton, 1993. Using 'Found' Data to Augment a Probability Sample: Procedure and a Case Study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 26:65-83.
24. R Development Core Team. 2004. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org.
25. Reeves, G.H., D.B. Hohler, D.P. Larsen, D.E. Busch, K. Krratz, K. Reynolds, K.F. Stein, T. Atzet, P. Hays, and M. Tehan, 2004. Effectiveness Monitoring for the Aquatic and Riparian Component of the Northwest Forest Plan: Conceptual Framework and Options. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-577. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, Oregon. 71 pp.
26. Roper, B.B., J.L. Kershner, and R.C. Henderson, 2003. The Value of Using Permanent Sites when Evaluating Stream Attributes at the Reach Scale. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 18:585-592.
27. Seaber, P.R., P. Kapinos, and G.L. Knapp, 1987. Hydrologic Unit Maps. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2294. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC. 63 pp.
28. Stevens, D.L., Jr., 1997. Variable Density Grid-based Sampling Designs for Continuous Spatial Populations. Environmetrics 8:167-195.
29. Stevens, D.L., Jr., 2002. Sampling Design and Statistical Analysis Methods for the Integrated Biological and Physical Monitoring of Oregon Streams. Report Number: OPSW-ODFW-2002-07. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland, Oregon.
30. Stevens, D.L., Jr. and A.R. Olsen, 1999. Spatially Restricted Surveys over Time for Aquatic Resources. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 4:415-428.
31. Stevens, D.L., Jr. and A.R. Olsen, 2003. Variance Estimation for Spatially Balanced Samples of Environmental Resources. Environmetrics 14:593-610.
32. Stevens, D.L., Jr. and A.R. Olsen, 2004. Spatially Balanced Sampling of Natural Resources. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99:262-278.
33. Stevens, D.L., Jr. and Urquhart N.S., 1999. Response Designs and Support Regions in Sampling Continuous Domains. Environmetrics 11:13-41.
34. Thompson, S.K., 1992. Sampling. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 360 pp.