A quantitative electroencephalographic correlate of sustained attention processing

Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 11-17

  Arruda, James E ^a   Amoss, R Toby ^b   Coburn, Kerry L ^b   McGee, Heather ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA   (United States)

^b MERCER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

EEG; FA; Factor analysis; PCA; Performance; Principal component analysis; Right hemisphere; Sustained attention; Vigilance

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BETA RHYTHM; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION; BETA RHYTHM; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FRONTAL LOBE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICS; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 33947666737     PISSN: 10900586     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10484-007-9030-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson, T. W., & Rubin, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis. Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics, Statistics, and Probability, 5, 111-150.
2. Arruda, J. E., Walker, K. A., Weiler, M. D., & Valentino, D. A. (1999). Validation of a right hemisphere vigilance system as measured by principal component and factor analyzed quantitative electroencephalogram. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 32, 119-128.
3. Arruda, J. E., Weiler, M. D., Valentino, D. A., Willis, G., Rossi, J., Stern, R. A., Gold, S., & Costa, L. (1996). A guide for applying principal-component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to quantitative electroencephalogram data. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 63-81.
4. Bearden, T. S., Cassisi, J. E., & White, J. N. (2004). Electrophysiological correlates of vigilance during a continuous performance test in healthy adults. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 29, 175-188.
5. Buchsbaum, M. S., Nuechterlein, K. H., Haier, R. J., et al. (1990). Glucose metabolic rate in normals and schizophrenics during the continuous performance test assessed by positron emission tomography. British Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 216-227.
6. Coburn, K. L., & Moreno, M. A. (1988). Facts and artifacts in brain electrical activity mapping. Brain Topography, 1, 37-45.
7. Costa, L., Arruda, J. E., Stern, R. A., Somerville, J. A., & Valentino, D. A. (1997). Asymptomatic HIV-1 infected women: A preliminary study of qEEG activity and CPT performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 1395-1408.
8. Fava, J. L., & Velicer, W. F. (1992). An empirical comparison of factor, image, component, and scale scores. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 301-322.
9. Feldman, H. H., & Jacova, C. (2005). Mild cognitive impairment. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13, 645-655.
10. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
11. Kahn, E. M., Weiner, R. D., Brenner, R. P.,&Coppola, R. (1988). Topographicmaps of brain electrical activity-Pitfalls and precautions. Biological Psychiatry, 23, 628-636.
12. Lewin, J. S., Fiedman, L., Wu, D., Miller, D. A., Thompson, L. A., Klein, S. K., Wise, AlL., Hedera, P., Buckley, P., Meltzer, H., Friedland, R. P., & Duerk, J. L. (1996). Cortical localization of human sustained attention: Detection with functional MR using a visual vigilance paradigm. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 20, 695-701.
13. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
14. Paus, T., Zatorre, R. J., Hofle, N., Caramanos, Z., Gotman, J., Petrides, M., & Evans, A. C. (1997). Timerelated changes in neural systems underlying attention and arousal during the performance of an auditory vigilance task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 392-408.
15. Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
16. Ralph, M. A. L., Patterson, K., Graham, N., Dawson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (2003). Homogeneity and heterogeneity in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of 55 cases. Brain, 126, 2350-2362.
17. Saletu, B., Anderer, P., Saletu-Zyhlarz, G. M., Gruber, D., Metka, M.,& Huber, J. (2005). Identifying target regions for vigilance improvement under hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal syndrome patients by means of electroencephalographic tomography (LORETA). Psychopharmacology, 178, 389-399.
18. St. John, M., Kobus, D. A., Morrison, J. G., & Schmorrow, D. (2004). Overview of the DARPA augmented cognition technical integration experiment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 131-149.
19. Sturm, W., Longoni, F., Fimm, B., Dietrich, T., Weis, S., Kemna, S., Herzog, H., & Willmes, K. (2004). Network for auditory intrinsic alertness: A PET study. Neuropsychologia, 42, 563-568.
20. Tucker, D. M., &Williamson, P. A. (1984). Asymmetric neural control systems in human self-regulation. Psychological Review, 91, 185-215.
21. Valentino, D. A., Arruda, J. A., & Gold, S. A. (1993). Comparison of QEEG and response accuracy in good vs poorer performers during a vigilance task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 123-133.
22. Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1987). An evaluation of the effects of variable sampling on component, image, and factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22, 193-210.
23. Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). A comparison of five rules for determining the number of componentsto retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.