A spatial probit model for fine-scale mapping of disease genes

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 252-260

  De Iorio, Maria ^a   Verzilli, Claudio J ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesian probit regression; Genetic association studies; Retrospective likelihood

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE MAPPING; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BAYES THEOREM; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 22; CYTOCHROME P-450 CYP2D6; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPES; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; METABOLIC DETOXICATION, DRUG; MODELS, GENETIC;

EID: 33947662469     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: 10982272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20206     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ashby D, Hutton J, McGee M. 1993. Simple Bayesian analyses for case-controlled studies in cancer epidemiology. Statistician 42:385-389.
2. Browne W. 2006. MCMC Algorithms for constrained variance matrices. Comp Stat Data Analy 50:1655-1677.
3. Carroll RJ, Wang S, Wang CY. 1995. Prospective analysis of logistic case-control studies. J Am Stat Assoc 90:157-169.
4. Chib S, Greenberg E. 1998. Analysis of multivariate probit models. Biometrika 85:347-361.
5. Hosking L, Boyd P, Xu C, Nissum M, Cantone K, Purvis IJ, Khakhar R, Barnes MR, Liberwirth U, Hagen-Mann K, Ehm MG, Riley J. 2002. Linkage disequilibrium mapping identifies a 390 kb region associated with CYP2D6 poor drug metabolising activity. Pharmacogenomics 2:165-175.
6. Hudson RR. 2002. Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model. Bioinformatics 18:337-338.
7. Kullback S. 1959. Information Theory and Statistics. New York: Wiley.
8. Maniatis N, Morton NE, Gibson J, Xu CF, Hosking LK, Collins A. 2005. The optimal measure of linkage disequilibrium reduces error in association mapping of affection status. Hum Mol Genet 14:145-153.
9. Marshall R. 1988. Bayesian analysis of case control studies. Stat Med 7:1223-1230.
10. Morris AP, Whittaker JC, Xu CF, Hosking LK, Balding DJ. 2003. Multipoint linkage-disequilibrium mapping narrows location interval and identifies mutation heterogeneity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:13442-13446.
11. Nurminen M, Mutanen P. 1987. Exact Bayesian analysis of two proportion. Scand J Stat 14:67-77.
12. Prentice R, Pyke R. 1979. Logistic disease incidence and case-control studies. Biometrika 66:403-411.
13. Satten GA, Epstein MP. 2004. Comparison of prospective and retrospective methods for haplotype inference in case-control studies. Genet Epidemiol 27:192-201.
14. Schaid DJ, Rowland CM, Tines DE, Jacobson RM, Poland GA. 2002. Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. Am J Hum Genet 70:425-134.
15. Seaman S, Richardson S. 2001. Bayesian analysis of case control studies with categorical covariates. Biometrika 88:1073-1088.
16. Stram DO, Leigh Pearce C, Bretsky P, Freedman M, Hirschhorn DJN, Altshuler NKL, Henderson BE, Thomas DC. 2003. Modeling and E-M estimation of haplotype-specific relative risks from genotype data for a case- control study of unrelated individuals. Hum Hered 55:179-190.
17. Verzilli CJ, Stallard N, Whittaker JC. 2006. Bayesian graphical models for genomewide association studies. Am J Hum Genet 79:100-112.
18. Wong F, Carter C, Kohn R. 2003. Efficient estimation of covariance selection models. Biometrika 90:809-830.
19. Zelen M, Parker R. 1986. Case-control studies and Bayesian inference. Stat Med 5:261-269.