Using instant messaging for internet-based interviews

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 552-559

  Stieger, Stefan ^a   Göritz, Anja S ^b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; DEMOGRAPHY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTANT MESSAGING; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; ONLINE ANALYSIS; SELF REPORT; VALIDATION PROCESS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; HABIT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MOTIVATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMMUNICATION; DATA COLLECTION; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HABITS; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERVIEWS; MALE; MOTIVATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 33947661900     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.552     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Birnbaum, M.H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology 55:803-832.
2. Reips, U.-D. (2000). The Web experiment method: advantages, disadvantages, and solutions. In: Birnbaum, M.H. (ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 89-117.
3. Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: a handbook for researching online. London: Sage.
4. Riva, G. (2002). The sociocognitive psychology of computer-mediated communication: the present and future of technology-based interactions. CyberPsychology & Behavior 5:581-598.
5. Valkenburg, P., & Buijzen, M. (2003). Children, computer games and the Internet. Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences 39:23-34.
6. Bowe, F.G. (2002). Deaf and hard of hearing Americans' instant messaging and e-mail use: a national survey. American Annals of the Deaf 147:6-10.
7. The Radicati Group, Inc. (2003). Instant messaging and presence market trends, 2003-2007. Available at: www.radicati.com. Accessed July 15, 2006.
8. Danet, B. (1998). Text as mask: gender, play, and performance on the Internet. In: Jones, S.G. (ed.) Cybersociety 2.0: revisiting computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 129-158.
9. Voracek, M., Stieger, S., & Gindl, A. (2001). Online replication of evolutionary psychological evidence: sex differences in sexual jealousy in imagined scenarios of mate's sexual versus emotional infidelity. In: Reips, U.-D., & Bosnjak, M. (eds.) Dimensions of internet science. Lengerich: Pabst Science, pp. 91-112.
10. Pew. (2001). Teenage life online. Available at: www.pewinternet.org. Accessed July 15, 2006.
11. Whitty, M.T. (2002). Liar, liar! An examination of how open, supportive and honest people are in chat rooms. Computers in Human Behavior 18:343-352.
12. Bosnjak, M. (1997). Internetbasierte, computervermittelte psychologische Fragebogenuntersuchungen: Verfahrensdarstellung, -diskussion und empirische Analyse ausgewählter methodischer sowie inhaltlicher Aspekte. [Internet-based, computer-mediated psychological questionnaire studies: description and discussion of procedures and empirical analysis of selected aspects of methodology and content]. Mainz: Gardez.
13. Reips, U.-D. (2002). Internet-based psychological experimenting: five dos and five don'ts. Social Science Computer Review 20:241-249.
14. Wicker, A.W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: the relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues 25:41-78.
15. Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R.L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or Internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement 60:821-836.