Turn-taking Interaction as a Cooperative and Co-creative Process

Infant Behavior and Development

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 278-288

  Ikegami, Takashi ^a   Iizuka, Hiroyuki ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chaos; Co creation; Cooperation; Evolution; Genetic algorithm; Neural network; Prediction; Turn taking

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATION; CREATIVITY; ERROR; HUMAN; IMITATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MOTHER CHILD RELATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ALGORITHMS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CREATIVENESS; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; HUMANS; NERVE NET; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33947652120     PISSN: 01636383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bateson G. Steps to an ecology of mind (1972), Ballantine Books, New York
2. Chaminade T., and Decety J. Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency. Neuroreport 13 (2002) 1975-1978
3. Gergely G., and Watson J.S. Early social-emotional development: Contingency perception and the social-biofeedback model. In: Rochat P. (Ed). Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 101-137
4. Hobson R., and Lee A. Imitation and identification in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 40 (1999) 649-659
5. Iizuka H., and Ikegami T. Adaptability and diversity in simulated turn-taking behaviour. Artificial Life 10 4 (2003) 361-378
6. Murray, L., & Trevarthen, C. (1985). Emotional regulations of interactions between two-montholds and their mothers. In T. M. Field, & N.A. Fox (Eds.), Social perception in infants (p. 177-197). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. Nadel J. Imitation and imitation recognition: Functional use in preverbal infants and nonverbal children with autism. In: Meltzoff A., and Prinz W. (Eds). The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 42-62
8. Nadel J., Carchon I., Kervella C., Marcelli D., and R_eserbat-Plantey D. Expectancies for social contingency in 2-month-olds. Developmental Science 2 2 (1999) 164-173
9. Nolfi S., and Floreano D. Evolutionary robotics: The biology, intelligence, and technology of self-organizing machines (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
10. Pachet F. Enhancing individual creativity with interactive musical reflective systems. In: Deli_ege I., and Wiggins G. (Eds). Musical creativity: Current research in theory and practice (2006), Psychology Press, Hove, UK
11. Pfeifer R., and Scheier C. Understanding intelligence (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
12. Reed E.S. Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology (1996), Oxford University Press, New York
13. Reed, E. S., Palmer, C., & Schoenherr, D. (1993). On the nature and significance of microslips in everyday activities. Unpublished manuscript.
14. Rochat P. The self in infancy: Theory and research (advances in psychology) (1995), North-Holland/Elsevier Science, North-Amsterdam
15. Rochat P., Neisser U., and Marian V. Are young infants sensitive to interpersonal contingency?. Infant Behavior and Development 21 2 (1998) 355-366
16. Thelen E., and Smith L.B. A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
17. Trevarthen C. Musicality and the intrinsic motive pulse: Evidence from human psychology and infant communication. Musicae Scientiae, Special Issue (1999) 155-215
18. Uno R., and Ikegami T. Joint attention/prediction and language: A mechanism to align intentionalities. Cognitive Linguistics 2 (2003) 231-274