A notional worlds approach to confusion

Mind and Language

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 150-172

  Lawlor, Krista ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947623025     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: 14680017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00304.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Camp, J. 2002: Confusion: A Study in the Theory of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Camp, J. 1988: Why attributions of aboutness report soft facts. Philosophical Topics, XVI, 5-30.
3. Evans, G. 1982: Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Field, H. 1973: Theory change and the indeterminacy of reference. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 462-81.
5. Frost-Arnold, G. 2005: Too much reference. American Philosophical Association (Eastern Division) presentation.
6. Lawlor, K. 2005: Confused thought and modes of presentation. Philosophical Quarterly, 55, 218, 21-37.
7. Millikan, R.G. 2000: On Clear and Confused Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Perry, J. 2001: Reference and Reflexivity. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
9. Powell, G. 2002: Underdetermination and the principles of semantic theory. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 102, 3, 321-328.