Reply to comment by Haaland et al. on "A new interpretation of Weimer et al.'s solar wind propagation delay technique"

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Volumn 111, Issue 6, 2006, Pages

  Bargatze, L F ^a   McPherron, R L ^a,b   Minamora, J ^c   Weimer, D ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c California Institute of Technology   (United States)

^d NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947607335     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21699402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2005JA011557     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. Bargatze, L. F., and R. L. McPherron (2004), Impulse response of the Polar Cap index (PC) to interplanetary coupling using a revised Weimer solar wind propagation method, Eos Trans. AGU, 85(47), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract SM43A-1138.
2. Bargatze, L. F., R. L. McPherron, J. Minamora, and D. Weimer (2005), A new interpretation of Weimer et al.'s solar wind propagation delay technique, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A07105, doi:10.1029/2004JA010902.
3. Haaland, S. E., et al. (2004), Four-spacecraft determination of magnetopause orientation, motion and thickness: Comparison with results from single-spacecraft methods, Ann. Geophys., 22, 1347-1365.
4. Haaland, S. E., G. Paschmann, and B. U. Ö. Sonnerup (2006), Comment on "A new interpretation of Weimer et al.'s solar wind propagation delay technique" by Bargatze et al., J. Geophys. Res., 111, A06102, doi:10.1029/2005JA011376.
5. Khrabrov, A. V., and B. U. Ö. Sonnerup (1998), Error estimates for minimum variance analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 6641-6651.
6. Knetter, T., F. M. Neubauer, T. Horbury, and A. Balogh (2004), Four-point discontinuity observations using Cluster magnetic field data: A statistical survey, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A06102, doi:10.1029/2003JA010099.
7. Neugebauer, M., D. R. Clay, B. E. Goldstein, B. T. Tsurutani, and R. D. Zwickl (1984), A reexamination of rotational and tangential discontinuities in the solar wind. J. Geophys. Res., 89, 5395-5408.
8. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö., and M. Scheible (1998), Minimum and maximum variance analysis, in Analysis Methods for Multi-Spacecraft Data, ISSI SR-001, edited by G. Paschmann and P. W. Daly, p. 185, ESA Publ. Div., Noordjwick, Netherlands.
9. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö., S. Haaland, G. Paschmann, B. Lavraud, M. W. Dunlop, H. Rème, and A. Balogh (2004), Orientation and motion of a discontinuity from single-spacecraft measurements of plasma velocity and density: Minimum mass flux residue, J. Geophys. Res., 109, A03221, doi:10.1029/2003JA010230.
10. Weimer, D. R. (2004), Correction to "Predicting interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) propagation delay times using the minimum variance technique," J. Geophys. Res., 109, A12104, doi:10.1029/2004JA010691.
11. Weimer, D. R., D. M. Ober, N. C. Maynard, W. J. Burke, M. R. Collier, D. J. McComas, N. F. Ness, and C. W. Smith (2002), Variable time delays in the propagation of the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 107(A8), 1210, doi:10.1029/2001JA009102.
12. Weimer, D. R., D. M. Ober, N. C. Maynard, M. R. Collier, D. J. McComas, N. F. Ness, C. W. Smith, and J. Watermann (2003), Predicting interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) propagation delay times using the minimum variance technique, J. Geophys. Res., 108(A1), 1026, doi:10.1029/2002JA009405.