Definition and use of Computation Independent Models in an MDA-based groupware development process

Science of Computer Programming

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 25-43

  Garrido, José Luis ^a   Noguera, Manuel ^a   González, Miguel ^b   Hurtado, María V ^a   Rodríguez, María L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

CSCW; Enterprise modeling; Groupware development process; MDA; Ontology; OWL; Software models; UML

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONTOLOGY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

ENTERPRISE MODELING; GROUPWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; SOFTWARE MODELS;

GROUPWARE;

EID: 33947607211     PISSN: 01676423     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scico.2006.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. J. Aagedal, I. Solheim, New roles in model-driven development, in: 2nd European Workshop on MDA, Technical Report No. 17-04, September 2004
2. M.S. Abdullah, A. Evans, I. Benest, C. Kimble, Developing a UML profile for modelling knowledge-based systems, in: Proceedings of Model-Driven Architecture: Foundations and Applications, MDAFA 2004, 2004, pp. 202-216
3. Andrade L.F., and Fiadeiro J.L. Agility through coordination. Information Systems 27 (2002) 411-424
4. J.P.A. Almeida, L. Ferreira Pires, M. van Sinderen, D. Quartel, A Systematic approach to platform-independent design based on the service concept, In: Proceedings Seventh IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, EDOC 2003, Brisbane, Australia, September 2003, pp. 112-123
5. Baader F., Calvanese D., McGuineness D., Nardi D., and Patel-Schneider P. The Description Logic Handbook (2003), Cambridge University Press
6. A. Belangour, J. Bézivin, M. Fredj, Towards Platform Independence: a MDA Organization, INRIA ATLAS de l'Université de Nantes, France, LGI-ENSIAS Rabat, Maroc, 2002
7. Bendraou R., Desfray P., and Gervais M.P. MDA components: A flexible way for implementing the MDA approach. ECMDA-FA 2005. LNCS vol. 3748 (2005) 59-73
8. T. Bloomfield, MDA, Meta-modelling and model transformation: Introducing new technology into the defence industry, in: ECMDA-FA 2005, pp. 9-18
9. Carriero N., and Gelernter D. Linda in context. Communications of the ACM 32 4 (1989) 444-458
10. Castro J., Kolp M., and Mylopoulos J. Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering: The TROPOS project. Information Systems 27 (2002) 365-389
11. Chen H.-M., Kazman R., and Garg A. BITAM: An engineering-principled method for managing misalignments between business and IT architectures. Science of Computer Programming 57 (2005) 5-26
12. Chung L., Gross D., and Yu E. Architectural design to meet stakeholder requirements. In: Donohue P. (Ed). Software Architecture (1999), Kluwer Academic, San Antonio, TX 545-564
13. Djuric D. MDA-based ontology infrastructure. Computer Science and Information Systems (ComSIS) 1 1 (2004) 91-116
14. M. Eichberg, MDA and programming languages, in: J. Bettin, G. van Emde Boas, C. Cleaveland, K. Czarnecki (Eds.), Workshop Generative Techniques in the Context of Model-driven Architecture, OOPSLA 2002, November, 2002
15. Ellis C.A., Gibbs S.J., and Rein G.L. Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM 34 1 (1991) 38-58
16. Evermann J., and Wand Y. Toward formalizing domain modeling semantics in language syntax. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31 1 (2005)
17. Fox M.S., and Gruninger M. On ontologies and enterprise modelling. Proceedings of the International Conference on Enterprise Integration Modelling Technology 97 (1997), Springer Verlag
18. J.L. Garrido, Especificación de la notación COMO-UML, Tech. Rep. No. LSI-2003-2, Granada, Spain, University of Granada, Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos, 2003
19. Garrido J.L., and Gea M. A Coloured Petri Net formalisation for a UML-based notation applied to cooperative system modeling. In: Forbrig P., et al. (Ed). Interactive Systems - Design, Specification and Verification. LNCS vol. 2545 (2002), Springer 16-28
20. Garrido J.L., Gea M., and Rodríguez M.L. Requirements engineering in cooperative systems. Requirements Engineering for Sociotechnical Systems (2005), Idea Group, Inc., USA (Chapter XIV)
21. J.L. Garrido, P. Padereswki, M.L. Rodríguez, M.J. Hornos, M. Noguera, A software architecture intended to design high quality groupware applications, in: Proc. of the 4th International Workshop on System/Software Architectures, IWSSA'05, Las Vegas, USA, June 2005
22. Green P., Rosemann M., Indulska M., and Manning C. Candidate interoperability standards: An ontological overlap analysis. Data Knowledge Engineering (2006) 10.1016/j.datak.2006.08.004
23. Greenberg S. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware (1991), Academic Press Ltd., London, UK
24. Gruninger M., Atefi K., and Fox M.S. Ontologies to support process integration in enterprise engineering. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 6 4 (2000) 381-394
25. Guarino N. Formal ontology and information systems. In: Guarino N. (Ed). Proceedings of FOIS'98. Trento, Italy, June, 1998 (1998), IOS Press, Amsterdam 3-15
26. C. Hofmeister, R.L. Nord, D. Soni, Describing software architecture with UML, in: Proceedings of the First IFIP Working Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA1, San Antonio, TX, February 1999
27. ISO/IEC 10746-1, 2, 3, 4 | ITU-T Recommendation X.901, X.902, X.903, X.904, "Open Distributed Processing - Reference Model", OMG, 1995-1998
28. Jambalaya 2.2.0 build 15 2005/07/07 15:04, The Jambalaya Project, More info at http://www.thechiselgroup.org/jambalaya
29. Jung J.Y., Kim H., and Kang S.H. Standards-based approaches to B2B workflow integration. Computers & Industrial Engineering 51 2 (2006) 321-334
30. Knublauch H., Fergerson R.W., Noy N.F., and Musen M. The Protégé OWL Plugin: An open development environment for semantic web applications. LNCS vol. 3298 (2004) 229-243
31. Lera I., Juiz C., and Puigjaner R. Performance-related ontologies and semantic web applications for on-line performance assessment of intelligent systems. Science of Computer Programming 61 (2006) 27-37
32. {ring operator} Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, 2005
33. Macaulay L.A. Requirements Engineering (1996), Springer
34. N. Noy, A. Rector, Defining n-ary relations on the semantic web, Editor's draft 7 September 2005.http://smi-web.stanford.edu/people/noy/nAryRelations/n-aryRelations-2nd-WD.html
35. Object Management Group (OMG): UML Profile for Enterprise Distributed Object Computing (EDOC), OMG Document ptc/02-02-05, 2002
36. Object Mangagement Group: Model Driven Architecture (MDA) Guide, v1.0.1, OMG, omg/03-06-01
37. Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility (MOF) specification. OMG Document formal/2002-04-03
38. Object Management Group: Ontology Definition Metamodel (ODM). Sixth revised submission to OMG/ RFP ad/2003-03-40, document/05-08-01
39. Object Management Group: Software Process engineering metamodel v1.1 (SPEM), formal/05-01-06, January 2005
40. Object Management Group: Unified Modelling Language (UML) 2.0 Superstructure Specification, August 2003. Ptc/03-08-02, pp. 455-510
41. Object Management Group (OMG): UML Profile for ECA v1.0. formal/04-02-05, February 2004
42. M.K. Smith, C. Welty, and D.L. McGuinness, (Eds.), OWL Web Ontology Language Guide, W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-guide-20040210/. Latest version available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/
43. Pohl K. The three dimensions of requirements engineering. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. of Advanced Information Systems Engineering 1993, Paris (1993), Springer, Berlin 275-292
44. G. Klyne, J. Carroll (Eds.), Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and abstract syntax, W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/
45. Shaw M., and Garlan D. Formulations and formalisms in software architecture. In: van Leeuwen J. (Ed). Computer Science Today: Recent Trends and Developments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1000 (1995), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
46. Sun Microsystems: Jini Network Technology. http://www.sun.com/software/jini/index.html
47. Turner C.R., Fuggetta A., Lavazza L., and Wolf A.L. A conceptual basis for feature engineering. The Journal of Systems and Software 49 (1999)
48. D.C. Fallside, (Ed.), XML Schema Part 0: Primer, W3C, 2 May 2001. See http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-0-20041028/primer.html