In Vivo Contact Pressures in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 404-416

  Sharma, Adrija ^a   Komistek, Richard D ^a,b   Ranawat, Chittaranjan S ^c   Dennis, Douglas A ^a,b   Mahfouz, Mohamed R ^a,b  

^a The Center for Musculoskeletal Research   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c LENOX HILL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

contact pressure; fluoroscopy; inverse dynamics; mobile bearing; total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTACT STRESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR CONDYLE; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; SOFT TISSUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WEIGHT BEARING;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; POLYETHYLENE; PRESSURE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 33947600325     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Sathasivam S., Walker P.S., Campbell P.A., et al. The effect of contact area on wear relation to fixed bearing and mobile bearing replacements. J Biomed Mater Res 58 (2001) 282
2. Bartel D.L., Bicknell V.L., and Wright T.M. The effect of conformity, thickness and material on stresses in ultra high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 68A (1986) 1041
3. Werner F., Foster D., and Murray D.G. Influence of design on the transmission of torque across the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60 (1978) 342
4. Godest A.C., deCloke S., Tayloretal M., et al. A computational model for the prediction of total knee replacement kinematics in the sagittal plane. J Biomech 33 (2000) 435
5. Rand J.A., Trousdale R.T., Ilstrup D.M., et al. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 85A (2003) 259
6. Collier J.P., Mayor M.B., and McNamara J.L. Analysis of the failure of 122 polyethylene inserts from uncemented tibial knee components. Clin Orthop 273 (1991) 232
7. Jacobs J.J., Shanbhag A., Glant T.T., et al. Wear debris in total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2 (1994) 212
8. Sharkley P.F., Hozack W.J., Rothman R.H., et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clin Orthop 404 (2002) 7
9. Wimmer M.A., and Andriacchi T.P. Tractive forces during rolling motion of the knee: implications for wear in total knee replacement. J Biomech 30 (1997) 131
10. Kuster M.S., and Stachowaik G.W. Factors affecting polyethylene wear in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 25 (2002) 235
11. Bartel D.L., Burstein A.H., Toda M.D., et al. The effect of conformity and plastic thickness on contact stress in metal backed plastic implants. J Biomech Eng 107 (1985) 193
12. Walker SA. Determination of TKA contact mechanics from in vivo kinematic data. Master's thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 2000.
13. Sathasivam S., and Walker P.S. A computer model to predict subsurface damage in tibial inserts on total knees. J Orthop Res 16 (1998) 564
14. Machan S. Finite element analysis of polyethylene stresses in total knee replacements. PhD dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 2004.
15. Rawlinson J., Furman B., Li S., et al. Kinematics, stresses and damage from a TKA simulator and a finite element model. Transactions of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society (2001)
16. Giddings V.L., Kurtz S.M., and Edidin A.A. Total knee replacement polyethylene stresses during loading in a knee simulator. J Tribol 123 (2001) 842
17. Godest A.C., Meaugonin M., Haug E., et al. Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis. J Biomech 35 (2002) 267
18. Halloran J.P., Petrella A.J., and Rullkoetter P.J. Explicit finite element modeling of total knee replacement mechanics. J Biomech 38 (2005) 323
19. Ateshian G.A., Kwak S.D., Soslowsky L.J., et al. A stereophotogrammetric method for determining in situ contact areas in diarthrodial joints, a comparison with other methods. J Biomech 27 (1994) 111
20. Black J.D., Matejczyk M.B., and Greenwald A.S. Reversible cartilage staining technique for defining articular weight bearing surfaces. Clin Orthop 159 (1981) 265
21. Greenwald A.S., and O'Connor J.J. The transmission of load through the hip joint. J Biomech 4 (1971) 507
22. Kurosawa H., Fukubayashi T., and Nakajima H. Load bearing mode of the knee joint: physical behavior of the knee joint with or without the menisci. Clin Orthop 149 (1980) 283
23. Yao J.Q., and Seedhom B.B. A new technique for measuring contact areas in human joint-the '3S technique'. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 205 (1991) 69
24. Stewart T., Jin Z.M., Shaw D., et al. Experimental and theoretical study of the contact mechanics of five total knee joint replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 209 (1995) 255
25. Buechel F.F., Pappas M.J., and Makris G. Evaluation of contact stress in metal backed patellar replacements. Clin Orthop 273 (1991) 190
26. Mikosz R.P., Andriacchi T.P., and Andersson G.B. Model analysis of factors influencing the prediction of muscle forces at the knee. J Orthop Res 6 (1988) 205
27. Ahmed A.M., and Burke D.L. In-vitro measurement of static pressure distribution in synovial joints: Part I. Tibial surface of the knee. J Biomech Eng 105 (1983) 216
28. Harris M.L., Morberg P., Bruce W.J.M., et al. An improved method for measuring tibiofemoral contact areas in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of K-scan sensor and Fuji film. J Biomech 32 (1999) 951
29. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., and Mahfouz M.R. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop 410 (2003) 114
30. Hoff W.A., Komistek R.D., Dennis D.A., et al. A three dimensional determination of femorotibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy. Clin Biomech 13 (1998) 455
31. Komistek R.D., Dennis D.A., Mabe J.A., et al. An in vivo determination of patellofemoral contact positions. Clin Biomech 15 (2000) 29
32. Komistek R.D., Dennis D.A., Mahfouz M.R., et al. In vivo polyethylene bearing mobility is maintained in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 428 (2004) 207
33. Ranawat C.S., Komistek R., and Dennis D.A. In vivo kinematics for fixed and mobile bearing posterior stabilized knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 418 (2004) 184
34. Mahfouz M.R., Hoff W.A., Komistek R.D., et al. A robust method for registration of three dimensional knee implant models to two dimensional fluoroscopy images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22 (2003) 1561
35. McKellop H., Clarke I., Markolf K., et al. Friction and wear properties of polymer, metal and ceramic prosthetic joint materials evaluated on a multichannel screening device. J Biomed Mater Res 15 (1981) 619
36. Sathasivam S., and Walker P.S. A computer model with surface friction for the prediction of total knee kinematics. J Biomech 30 (1997) 177
37. Kurtz S.M., Villarraga M.L., Herr M.P., et al. Thermomechanical behavior of virgin and highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene used in total joint replacements. Biomaterials 23 (2002) 3681
38. Fregly B.J., Sawyer W.G., Harman M.K., et al. Computational wear prediction of a total knee replacement from in vivo kinematics. J Biomech 38 (2005) 305
39. Colwell Jr. C.W., Patil S., Steklov N., et al. An electronic knee prosthesis: measurements of tibial forces in vivo. Scientific Exhibit SE082, 47th AAOS Conference, Washington DC (2005)
40. Taylor S.J.G., and Walker P.S. Forces and moments telemetered from two distal femoral replacements during various activities. J Biomech 34 (2001) 839
41. Schipplein O.D., and Andriacchi T.P. Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking. J Orthop Res 9 (1991) 113
42. Morra E.A., Postak P.D., Heim C.S., et al. Tibial plateau abrasion in mobile bearing knee systems during walking gait II: a finite element study. Proc AAOS 3 (2002) 740