Application of activity chaining model incorporating a time use problem to network demand analysis

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1977, 2006, Pages 214-224

  Kim, Hyunmyung ^a   Oh, Jun Seok ^b   Jayakrishnan, R ^a  

^a University of California at Irvine   (United States)

^b Western Michigan University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; COSTS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ACTIVITY CHAINING MODEL; NETWORK DEMAND; TIME USE PROBLEM;

LAND USE;

EID: 33947596927     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1977-27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Kitamura, R. Incorporating Trip Chaining into Analysis of Destination Choice. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 18, 1984, pp. 67-81.
2. Recker, W. W., M. G. McNally, and G. S. Root. A Model of Complex Travel Behavior: Part I - Theoretical Development. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 20, 1986, pp. 307-318.
3. Recker, W. W., M. G. McNally, and G. S. Root. A Model of Complex Travel Behavior: Part II - Operational Model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 20, 1986, pp. 319-330.
4. Recker, W. W. The Household Activity Pattern Problem: General Formulation and Solution. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol.29, 1995, pp. 61-77.
5. Recker, W. W., C. Chen, and M. G. McNally. Measuring the Impact of Efficient Household Travel Decisions on Potential Travel Time Savings and Accessibility Gains. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 35, 2001, pp. 339-369.
6. Kitamura, R., E. I. Pas, C. V. Lula, T. K. Lawton, and P. E. Benson. The Sequenced Activity Mobility Simulator (SAMS): An Integrated Approach to Modeling Transportation, Land Use, and Air Quality. Transportation, 23,1996, pp. 267-291.
7. Arentze, T. A., and H. J. P. Timmermans. A Learning-Based Transportation Oriented Simulation Model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 613-633.
8. Bhat, C. R., J. Y. Guo, S. Srinivasan, and A. Sivakumar. Comprehensive Econometric Microsimulator for Daily Activity-Travel Patterns. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 57-66.
9. Bowman, J. L., and M. E. Ben-Akiva. Activity Based Disaggregate Travel Demand Model System with Activity Schedules. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 35, 2000, pp. 1-28.
10. Kitamura, R., and S. Fujii. Two Computational Process Models of Activity-Travel Choice. In Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modeling (T. Gärling, T. Laitila, and K. Westin, eds.), Elsevier Science, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1998, pp. 251-279.
11. Pendyala, R. M., R. Kitamura, and D. V. G. P. Reddy. Application of an Activity-Based Travel Demand Model Incorporating a Rule-Based Algorithm. Environment and Planning B, Vol. 25, 1998, pp. 753-772.
12. Murray-Tuite, P. M., and H. S. Mahmassani. Model of Household Trip Chain Sequencing in Emergency Evacuation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 21-29.
13. Murray-Tuite, P. M., and H. S. Mahmassani. Methodology for Determining Vulnerable Links in a Transportation Network. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1882, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 88-96.
14. Small, K. The Scheduling of Consumer Activities: Work Trips. The American Economic Review, Vol. 72, 1982, pp. 467-479.
15. Hendrickson, C., and E. Plank, The Flexibility of Departure Times for Work Trips. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 18, 1984, pp. 25-36.
16. Mahmassani, H., and G. Chang. Experiments with Departure Time Choice Dynamics of Urban Commuters. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 20, 1986, pp. 297-320.
17. Oh, J.-S., C. E. Cortes, and W. Recker. Effects of Less-Equilibrated Data on Travel Choice Model Estimation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 131-140.
18. Supernak, J. Temporal Utility Profiles of Activities and Travel: Uncertainty and Decision Making. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 26, 1992, pp. 61-76.
19. Zhang, X., H. Yang, H.-J. Huang, and H. M. Zhang. Integrated Scheduling of Daily Work Activities and Morning-Evening Commutes with Bottleneck Congestion. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 39, 2005, pp. 41-60.
20. Lam, W. H. K., and Y. Yin. An Activity-Based Time-Dependent Traffic Assignment Model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 35, 2001, pp. 549-574.
21. Huang, H., W. H. K. Lam, and K. S. Chan. Modeling Commuter Behaviour in Networks with ATIS for Combined Activity/Destination/Route Choice Problem. Presented at 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, Switzerland, 2003.
22. Mahmassani, H. S., H. Sbayti, and Z. Xuesong. DYNASMART-P Version 1.0 User Guide. Maryland Transportation Initiative, College Park, Md., 2004.
23. Hogarth, R. M. Judgement and Choice, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987.
24. Asakura, Y., and E. Hato. Tracking Survey for Individual Travel Behaviour Using Mobile Communication Instruments. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 12, 2004. pp. 273-291.