Technological research challenges of flight simulation and flight instructor assessments of perceived fidelity

Simulation and Gaming

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 112-135

  Robinson, Andrew ^a   Mania, Katerina ^b  

^a CAE Systems   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fidelity; Flight simulation; Human factors; Perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947594928     PISSN: 10468781     EISSN: 1552826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046878106299035     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Adelstein, B. D., Lee, T. G., & Ellis, S. R. (2003). Head tracking latency in virtual environments: Psychophysics and a model. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th annual meeting (pp. 2083-2087). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
2. Bennett, T. (2003). The downside of new advancements in simulation fidelity and avionic technologies. In Proceedings of the Royal Aeronautical Society Simulation of the Environment conference. London: Royal Aeronautical Society.
3. Denne, P. (2003). Virtual motion and electromagnetic rams from the Virtual Reality Forum. Retrieved from www.q3000.com/pdf/sim7.pdf
4. Ellis, S. R., Young, M. J., Adelstein, B. D., & Ehrlich, S. M. (1999). Discrimination of changes in latency during head movement. In Proceedings of Computer Human Interfaces (pp. 1129-1133). New York: ACM Press.
5. Green, R., Muir, H., James, D., Gradwell, D., & Green, R. (1992). Human factors for pilots. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
6. Guo, L., Cardullo, F., Telban, R., Houck, J., & Kelly, L. (2003). The results of a simulator study to determine the effects on pilot performance of two different motion cueing algorithms and various delays, compensated and uncompensated. In Research papers of the Link Foundation Fellows (AIAA-2003-5676). Retrieved from http://simulators.larc.nasa.gov/aiaa/aiaapapers.html
7. Mania, K., Adelstein, B., Ellis, S. R., & Hill, M. (2004). Perceptual sensitivity to head tracking latency in virtual environments with varying degrees of scene complexity. In Proceedings of the ACM Siggraph Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (pp. 39-47). New York: ACM Press.
8. Mania, K., & Chalmers, A. (2001). The effects of levels of immersion on presence and memory in virtual environments: A reality centred approach [Special issue]. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4 (2), 247-264.
9. Mania, K., & Robinson, A. (2005). An experimental exploration of the relationship between subjective impressions of illumination and physical fidelity. Computers and Graphics, 29 (1), 49-56.
10. Mania, K., Robinson, A., & Brandt, K. (2005). The effect of memory schemas on object recognition in virtual environments. Presence, Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14 (5), 606-615.
11. Mania, K., Troscianko, T., Hawkes, R., & Chalmers, A. (2003). Fidelity metrics for virtual environment simulations based on spatial memory awareness states. Presence, Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12 (3), 296-310.
12. McNamara, A. (2001). Visual perception in realistic image synthesis. Computer Graphics Forum, 20 (4), 211-224.
13. Meehan, M., Razzaque, S., Whitton, M., & Brooks, F. (2003). Effect of latency on presence in stressful virtual environments. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality '03 (pp. 141-148). Washington, DC: IEEE.
14. Rolfe, J. M., & Staples, K. J. (1986). Flight simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Sheridan, T. B., & Ferrell, W. R. (1963). Remote manipulative control with transmission delay. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 4 (1), 25-29.
16. Thom, T., & Godwin, P. (Eds.). (2002). The air pilot's manual, Volume 2: Aviation law and meteorology. Stamford, UK: Air Pilot Publisher Ltd.