Transit ridership model based on geographically weighted regression

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1972, 2006, Pages 105-114

  Chow, Lee Fang ^a   Zhao, Fang ^a   Liu, Xuemei ^a   Li, Min Tang ^b   Ubaka, Ike ^b  

^a The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^b FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION (GWR); HOME-BASED WORK (HBW); SOCIOECONOMICS; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 33947591178     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1972-15     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Kolin, H. M. Factors Affecting Urban Transit Ridership. Proc., 35th Annual Conference of the Canadian Transportation Research Forum, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada, 2000, pp. 271-285.
2. Chatterjee, A., W. L. Seaver, V. Kiattikomol, and F. J. Wegmann. Models for Forecasting Urban Transit Ridership for Statewide Analysis. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
3. Yoh, A. C., P. J. Haas, and B. D. Taylor. Understanding Transit Ridership Growth: Case Studies of Successful Transit Systems in the 1990s. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1835, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 111-120.
4. Taylor, B. D., D. Miller, H. Iseki, and C. Fink. Analyzing the Determinants of Transit Ridership Using Two-Stage Least-Squares Regression on National Sample of Urbanized Areas. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.
5. Parker, T., M. McKeever, G. B. Arlington, and J. Smith-Heimer. Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study-Factors for Success in California. Final Report. Prepared for Business, Transportation and Housing Agency and California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif., 2002.
6. Lawton, K. Metro 1994 Travel Behavior Survey, Portland Metro, Portland, Ore., 1997.
7. Parsons Brinckerhoff. TCRP Report 16: Transit and Urban Form, Vol. 1, Part 1. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996.
8. Parsons Brinckerhoff. TCRP Report 16: Commuter and Light Rail Transit Corridors: The Land Use Connection, Vol. 1, Part 2. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996.
9. Pushkarev, B. S., and J. M. Zupan. Where Transit Works: Urban Densities for Public Transportation. In Urban Transportation: Perspectives and Prospects (H. S. Levinson and R. A. Weant, eds.), Eno Foundation, Westport, Conn., 1982.
10. Kikuchi, S., and D. Miljkovic. Use of Fuzzy Inference for Modeling Prediction of Transit Ridership at Individual Stops. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1774, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 25-35.
11. Enhancement and Refinement of the Integrated Transit and Demand and Supply Model, T-BEST Arc Version 1.1, Users Guide. Public Transit Office, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2004.
12. Enhancement and Refinement of the Integrated Transit and Demand and Supply Model, T-BEST Arc Version 2.1, Users Guide. Public Transit Office, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2005.
13. Fotheringham, A. S., C. Brunsdon, and M. Charlton. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, United Kingdom, 2002.
14. Zhao, F., L.-F. Chow, and M.-T. Li. A Transit Ridership Model Based on Geographically Weighted Regression and Service Quality Variables. Final Report. Prepared for the Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, April 2005.