Preheating Acrylic Bone Cement Powder Is Not Recommended for All Brands

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 428-434

  Lewis, Gladius ^a   Janna, Si ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

acrylic bone cement; mechanical properties; physical properties

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEATING; POLYMERIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

BONE CEMENTS; CEMENTATION; HEAT; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 33947590511     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.014     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Dall D.M., Miles A.W., and Juby G. Accelerated polymerization of acrylic bone cement using preheated implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 211 (1986)
2. Parks M.L., Walsh H.A., Salvati E.A., et al. Effect of increasing temperature on the properties of four bone cements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355 (1998)
3. Turell M.E., and Fitz W. Preheating of PMMA polymer powder and its effect on working time. Transactions of the 50th annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, March 7-10, 2004, San Francisco, CA, USA (2004) 1524
4. Bishop N., Ferguson S., and Tepic S. Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78 (1996) 349
5. Iesaka K., Jaffe W.L., and Kummer F.J. Effects of preheating of hip prosthesis on the stem-cement interface. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 (2003) 421
6. Li C., Schmid S., and Mason J. Effects of pre-cooling and pre-heating procedures on cement polymerization and thermal osteonecrosis in cemented hip replacements. Med Eng Phys 25 (2003) 559
7. Kuhn K.-D. Bone cements: up-to-date comparisons of physical and chemical properties of commercial materials (2000), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
8. Lewis G. Properties of acrylic bone cement: state-of-the-art review. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 38 (1997) 155
9. Jasty M., Maloney W.J., Bragdon C.R., et al. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73 (1991) 551
10. Prendergast P.J. The functional performance of orthopaedic bone cement. Key Eng Mater 198-199 (2001) 291
11. Race A., Miller M.A., Ayers D.C., et al. Early cement damage around a femoral stem is concentrated at the cement/bone interface. J Biomech 36 (2003) 489
12. Malchau H., Herberts P., Eisler T., et al. The Swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 (2002) 2
13. Shannon B.D., Klassen J.F., Rand J.A., et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented components and uncemented intramedullary stems. J Arthroplasty 18 (2003) 27
14. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard D 5045-99. Standard test methods for plane-strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials. 2005 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 08.02: Plastics (II). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 800-808.
15. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM): Standard F 2118-03, Standard test method for constant amplitude of force controlled fatigue testing of acrylic bone cement materials. 2005 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 13.01: Medical devices and surgical materials and devices; anesthetic and respiratory equipment; pharmaceutical application of process analytical technology. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2005. p.1182.
16. Weibull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 18 (1951) 293
17. Janna S., Dwiggins D.P., and Lewis G. A new, reliable, and simple-to-use method for the analysis of a population of values of a random variable using the Weibull probability distribution: application to acrylic bone cement fatigue results. Bio-Med Mater Eng 15 (2005) 349
18. He S., Scott C., and Higham P. Mixing of acrylic bone cement: effect of oxygen on setting properties. Biomaterials 24 (2003) 5045
19. Friis E.A., Stromberg L.J., Cooke F.W., et al. Fracture toughness of vacuum mixed PMMA bone cement. Transactions of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, April 28-May 2, 1993, Birmingham, AL, USA (1993) 301
20. Guandalini L., Baleani M., and Viceconti M. A procedure and criterion for bone cement fracture toughness tests. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H: Eng Med 218 (2004) 445
21. Linden U. Fatigue properties of bone cement: comparison of mixing techniques. Acta Orthop Scand 60 (1989) 431
22. Prendergast P.J., Murphy B.P., and Taylor D. Letter to the editor. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 25 (2002) 315
23. Lewis G. Fatigue testing and performance of acrylic bone-cement materials: state-of-the-art review. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 60B (2003) 457
24. Lewis G., and Sadhasivini A. Estimation of the minimum number of test specimens for fatigue testing of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 25 (2004) 4425
25. Imai Y., and Ohyama A. Characterization of powder components of commercial bone cements. Dent Mater J 20 (2001) 345
26. Shultz A.Z. Cleavage reactions: radiation. In: Fettes E.M. (Ed). Chemical reactions of polymers (1964), Interscience Publishers, New York 645
27. Lewis G., and Mladsi S. Effect of sterilization method on properties of Palacos R acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 19 (1998) 117
28. Graham J., Pruitt L., Ries M., et al. Fracture and fatigue properties of acrylic bone cement-The effects of mixing method, sterilization treatment, and molecular weight. J Arthroplasty 15 (2000) 1028
29. Espehaug B., Furnes O., Havelin L., et al. The type of cement and failure of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 84-B (2002) 832
30. Milner R. The development of theoretical relationships between some handling parameters (setting time and setting temperature), composition (relative amounts of initiator and activator), and ambient temperature for acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 68B (2004) 180