Systems analysis of hydrogen transition with HyTrans

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1983, 2006, Pages 129-139

  Leiby, Paul N ^a   Greene, David L ^a   Bowman, David ^a   Tworek, Elzbieta ^b  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Business Development Scout Industries   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURE; COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PUBLIC POLICY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

HYDROGEN TRANSITION; MARKET TRANSITION;

HYDROGEN FUELS;

EID: 33947587953     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1983-18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Committee on Alternatives and Strategies for Future Hydrogen Production and Use. The Hydrogen Economy. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2004.
2. Romm, J. J. The Hype About Hydrogen: Fact and Fiction in the Race to Save the Climate. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 2004.
3. Leiby, P. N., D. L. Greene, S. Das, D. Bowman, and E. Tworek. HYTRANS: Hydrogen Transition Model Version 1.5. Draft report. Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., Sept. 30, 2005.
4. Annual Energy Outlook 2005. DOE/EIA-0383(2005). Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., 2005.
5. Yeh, S., and D. Loughlin. An Integrated Hydrogen Scenario Analysis: Impacts on Transportation, Energy Use, and Air Emissions. Presented at National Hydrogen Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., March 31, 2005.
6. Multiyear Program Plan: FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies. U.S. Department of Energy, www.eere.energy.gov. August 2004.
7. Greene, D. L., P. N. Leiby, S. Das, D. Bowman, and E. Tworek. Initial Hydrogen Transition Scenarios Developed Using the HyTrans Model. Progress report. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., March 29, 2005.
8. Das, S. A Comparative Assessment of Alternative Power-Trains and Body-in-White Materials for Advanced Technology Vehicles, SAE Technical Paper Series, 2004-01-0573. SAE, Warrendale, Pa., 2004.
9. Fulton, L., D. Gielen, and C. Difiglio. Hydrogen Transition Costs and Strategies for the Transportation Sector. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
10. H2A Central Hydrogen Production Model Users Guide; Version 1.0.10. U.S. Department of Energy, July 2005. www.hydrogen.energy.gov/h2a_analysis.html.
11. Hydrogen, Fuel Cells & Infrastructure Technologies Program: Multi-Year Research, Development and Demonstration Plan. DOE/GO-102003-1741, U.S. Department of Energy, Jan. 2005.
12. Steimetz, S. S. C., and D. Brownstone. Estimating Commuters' "Value of Time" with Noisy Data: A Multiple Imputation Approach. Presentation at University of California, Irvine, Nov. 24, 2004.
13. Lam, T., and K. A. Small. The Value of Time and Reliability: Measurement from a Value Pricing Experiment. Transportation Research, Part E, Vol. 37, 2001, pp. 231-251.
14. Small, K. A., C. Winston, and J. Yan. Uncovering the Distribution of Motorists' Preferences for Travel Time and Reliability: Implications for Road Pricing. Working paper. University of California, Irvine, 2002.
15. Nicholas, M. A., S. L. Handy, and D. Sperling. Using Geographical Information Systems to Evaluate Siting and Networks of Hydrogen Stations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1880, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 126-134.
16. Greene, D. L., TAFV Alternative Fuels and Vehicles Choice Model Documentation. Report. ORNL/TM-2001/134, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., July 2001.
17. Bowman, D., D. L. Greene, P. N. Leiby, and E. Tworek. Progress Report: HyTrans Sensitivity Analysis. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., June 30, 2005.
18. Burns, L. D., J. B. McCormick, and C. E. Borroni-Bird. Vehicle of Change. Scientific American, 2002, pp. 65-73, 2002.