![]() |
Volumn 245, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 555-559
|
Does the surface property of a disposable applanation tonometer account for its underestimation of intraocular pressure when compared with the Goldmann tonometer?
|
Author keywords
Applanation; Disposable tonometer; Goldmann; Tonojet
|
Indexed keywords
FLUORESCEIN;
LIDOCAINE;
ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC ERROR;
DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT;
HYDROPHILICITY;
HYPOTHESIS;
INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SURFACE PROPERTY;
TONOMETRY;
DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS;
DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT;
FLUORESCEIN;
INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE;
LIDOCAINE;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SURFACE PROPERTIES;
SURFACE TENSION;
TONOMETRY, OCULAR;
|
EID: 33947587080
PISSN: 0721832X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-006-0380-9 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (5)
|
References (8)
|