Effects of land use characteristics on residence and employment location and travel behavior of urban adult workers

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1977, 2006, Pages 121-131

  De Abreu e Silva, João ^a   Golob, Thomas F ^b   Goulias, Konstadinos G ^c  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; LOCATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; URBAN PLANNING;

DEMOGRAPHY; STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODEL; WORK LOCATIONS;

LAND USE;

EID: 33947583103     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Van Wee, B. Land Use and Transport: Research and Policy Challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 10, 2002, pp. 259-271.
2. Newman, P., and J. Kenworthy. Cities and Automobile Dependence: An International Sourcebook. Gower Technical, Aldershot, United Kingdom, 1989.
3. Stead, D., et al. Land Use, Transport and People: Identifying the Connections. In Achieving Sustainable Urban Form (K. Williams, E. Burton, and M. Jenks, eds.), Spon Press, London, 2001.
4. Naess, P. Residential Location Affects Travel Behavior-But How and Why? The Case of Copenhagen Metropolitan Area. Progress in Planning, Vol. 63, 2005, pp. 167-257.
5. Liens entre forme urbaine et pratiques de mobilité: les resultats du projet SESAME. Certu, Cete Nord-Picardie, Lyon, France, 1999.
6. Dargay, J. M., and M. Hanly. The Impact of Land Use on Travel Behaviour. Presented at European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France, 2003. www.cts.ucl.ac.uk/tsu/papers/Dargay&HanlyLandUseETCwithcover.pdf. Accessed March 2004.
7. Dargay, J. M., and M. Hanly. Land Use and Mobility. Presented at World Conference on Transport Research, Istanbul, Turkey, 2004. www.cts.ucl.ac.uk/tsu/ papers/NTSWCTR04Final.pdf. Accessed Jan. 2005.
8. Handy, S. Smart Growth and the Transportation-Land Use Connection: What Does the Research Tell Us? 2002. www.smartgrowth.umd.edu/events/pdf/ HandyPaper2.pdf. Accessed Aug. 2003.
9. Bagley, M. N., and P. L. Mokhtarian. The Impact of Residential Neigh-borhood Type on Travel Behavior: A Structural Equations Modeling Approach. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 36, 2002, pp. 279-297.
10. Schwanen, T., and P. L. Mokhtarian. What Affects Commute Mode Choice: Neighborhood Physical Structure or Preferences Toward Neighborhoods? Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 13, 2005, pp. 83-99.
11. Zhang, M. Conditions and Effectiveness of Land Use as a Mobility Tool. Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2002.
12. Pendyala, R. M. Time Use and Travel Behavior in Space and Time in Transportation Systems Planning: Methods and Applications (K. G. Goulias, ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fia., 2003.
13. Golob, T. F. Structural Equations Modeling for Travel Behavior Research. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 37, 2003, pp. 1-25.
14. Golob, T. F. Structural Equation Modeling. In Transportation Systems Planning: Methods and Applications (K. G. Goulias, ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 2003.
15. Jöreskog, K., and D. Sörbom. USREL® 8: User's Reference Guide. SSI Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, 111. 2001.
16. Kaplan, D. Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2000.