The live or digital interviewer: A comparison between CASI, CAPI and CATI with respect to differences in response behaviour

International Journal of Market Research

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 167-190

  Bronner, Fred ^a   Kuijlen, Ton ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947573913     PISSN: 14707853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/147078530704900204     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Allison, J. & O'Konis, C. (2002) If given the choice. Quirk's Marketing Research Review, 20, July/August.
2. Bronner, F., Tchaoussoglou, C. & Ross, R. (2003) The virtual interviewer. Proceedings of Worldwide Readership Research Symposium, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 121-130.
3. de Heer, W. (1999) International response trends, results of an international survey. Journal of Official Statistics, 15, 2, pp. 129-142.
4. de Leeuw, E. (2005) To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21, 2, pp. 233-255.
5. de Leeuw, E., Hox, J., Kef, S. & van Hattum, M. (2000) Computer assisted self-interviewing tailored for special populations: a guide on how to overcome the problems of special interviews and sensitive topics. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Logic and Methodology, Cologne, CDROM/PDF022302.
6. Deutskens, E., de Jong, A., de Ruyter, K. & Wetzels, M. (2006) Comparing the generalizability of online and mail surveys in cross-national service quality research. Marketing Letters, 17, pp. 119-136.
7. Dillman, D.A. & Christian, L.M. (2003) Survey mode as a source of instability in responses across surveys. Field Methods, 15, 2, pp. 1-22.
8. Dillman, D.A., Phelps, G., Tortora, R., Swift, K., Kohrell, J. & Berck, J. (2001) telephone, interactive voice response and internet. Proceedings of AAPOR Annual Conference, Montreal.
9. Duffy, B., Smith, K., Terhanian, G. & Bremer, J. (2005) Comparing data from online and face-to-face surveys. International Journal of Market Research, 47, 6, pp. 615-639.
10. Epstein, J., Barker, P. & Kroutil, L. (2001) Mode effects in self-reported mental health data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, pp. 529-549.
11. Havermans, J. (2003) The strength is in online research. Research World, 1, pp. 4-6.
12. Hogg, A. (2002) Conducting online research. www.burke.com/whitepapers/ vol3/iss2.pdf.
13. Krosnick, J. (2000) The threat of satisficing in surveys: the shortcuts respondents take in answering questions. Survey Methods Newsletter, 20, pp. 4-8.
14. Lindner, G. & Mallett, D. (1995) The interviewer effect on readership levels. Proceedings of 7th Worldwide Readership Research Symposium, Berlin, pp. 209-217.
15. Macer, T. (2003) We seek them here, we seek them there. In: R. Banks et al. (eds) Survey and Statistical Computing IV, the Impact of Technology on the Survey Process. Association for Survey Computing, Berkeley, UK.
16. Morton-Williams, J. (1993) Interviewer Approaches. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.
17. Mosmann, H. (1998) Finding the Facts: Response Patterns PAPI-CAPI-CATI. Mölln: INRA Deutschland.
18. Newman, J., Des Jarlais, D., Turner. C., Gribble, J., Cooley, P. & Paone, D. (2002) The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 2, pp. 294-297.
19. Nicholls, W.L., Baker, R.P. & Martin, J. (1997) The effect of new data collection technologies on survey data quality. In: L. Lyberg et al. (eds) Survey Measurement and Process Quality. New York: Wiley.
20. Oosterveld, P. & Willems, P. (2003) Two modalities: one answer. Proceedings of ESOMAR Technovate Conference, Cannes.
21. Poynter, R. & Comely, P. (2003) Beyond online panels. Proceedings of ESOMAR Technovate Conference, Cannes.
22. Stoop, I.A.L. (2005) The Hunt for the Last Respondent: Nonresponse in Sample Surveys. Den Haag: SCP.
23. Taylor, H. (2000) Does internet research work? International Journal of Market Research, 42, 1, pp. 51-63.
24. Taylor, H., Krane, D. & Thomas, R.K. (2005) How does social desirability affect responses? Differences in telephone and online. Public Opinion Pros, February.