Framing AIDS mobilization and human rights in post-apartheid South Africa

Perspectives on Politics

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 663-670

  Johnson, Krista ^a  

^a AGNES SCOTT COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947572280     PISSN: 15375927     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1537592706060415     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Achmat, Zackic. 2004. The Treatment Action Campaign, HIV/AIDS and the Government. Transformation 54: 76-84.
2. Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611-39.
3. Cleary, Susan, and Don Ross. 2002. The 1998-2001 legal struggle between the South African government and the international pharmaceutical industry: A game-theoretic analysis. Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies 27 (4): 445-94.
4. Epstein, Steven. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Friedman, Steven, and Shauna Mottiar. 2004. Rewarding engagement? The Treatment Action Campaign and the politics of HIV/AIDS. Available at www.nu.ac.za/ccs/files/.
6. Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper Publishers.
7. Hall, Stuart. 1982. The rediscovery of "ideology": Return of the repressed in media studies. In Culture, Society and the Media, ed. Michael Gurevitch, Tony Bennett, James Curran, and Janet Woollacott. London: Methuen.
8. Heywood, Mark. 2001. Debunking "Conglomo-talk": A case study of the amicus curiae as an instrument for advocacy, investigation and mobilization. Paper presented at the Health, Law and Human Rights: Exploring the Connections conference, Sept. 29-Oct. 1, Philadelphia.
9. Johnson, Krista. 2005. Globalization and social policy in South Africa. New Political Science 27 (3): 309-30.
10. Kane-Berman, John, and Patrick Laurence. 2002. Nevirapine case hinges on "available resources' and treatment. Cape Times, May 24.
11. Keck, Margaret, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1999. Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal 51 (159): 89-101.
12. Klug, Heinz. 2000. Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa's Political Reconstruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Lichbach, Mark I. 1998. Contending theories of contentious politics and the structure-action problem of social order. Annual Review of Political Science 1 : 401-24.
14. Malherbe, Paul. 2002. Democracy, not insistence on core rights, will get people their basic benefits. Cape Times, July 4.
15. Masuku, Thabani, and Richard Calland. 2002. The state must afford core rights, or fail. Cape Times, June 6.
16. McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald, eds. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. NATO CIS Operating and Support Agency. 1994. A National AIDS Plan for South Africa 1994-5. Pretoria: National Secretariat, National AIDS Committee of South Africa.
18. Nattrass, Nicoli. 2004. The Moral Economy of AIDS in South Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Nolutshungu, Samuel. 1999. The constitutional question in South Africa. In TheState and Constitutionalism in Africa, ed. Issa Shivji. Harare: SAPES.
20. Schneider, Helen. 2002. On the fault-line: The politics of AIDS policy in contemporary South Africa. African Studies 61 (1): 145-67.
21. _. 2001. A struggle for symbolic power, Siyaya 8 (Winter): 8-21.
22. Schneider, Helen, and Joanne Stein. 2001. Implementing AIDS policy in post-apartheid South Africa. Social Science and Medicine 52 (5): 723-31.
23. Shisana, Olive, and Nompumelelo Zungu-Dirwayi. 2003. Government's changing responses to HIV/AIDS. Development Update: The (Real) State of the Nation: South Africa after 1990 4 (3): 165-87.
24. Snow, David A., and Robert D. Benford. 1988. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research across Cultures, ed. Bert Klandermans, Hanspeter Kriesi, Sidney Tarrow, 197-217. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
25. _. 1992. Master frames and cycles of protest. In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, ed. Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller. New Haven: Yale University Press.
26. Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Jr., Steven K. Worden,and Robert D. Benford. 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 51 (4): 464-81.
27. Treatment Action Campaign. 2001. Why TAC is joining the court case against the PMA. Treatment Action Campaign Fact Sheet, February 1. http://www.globaltreatmentaccess.org/content/press_releases/01/ 030501_TAC_PS_SA_lawsuit.html