|
Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 605-606
|
Should subgroup analysis of randomized clinical trials have a direct impact on clinical practice? [7]
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CANCER RISK;
CANCER SURVIVAL;
CANCER THERAPY;
CHRONOTHERAPY;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
HUMAN;
LETTER;
MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SAMPLE SIZE;
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COLORECTAL TUMOR;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
FEMALE;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MORTALITY;
NOTE;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
SEX DIFFERENCE;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
SURVIVAL;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;
ANTINEOPLASTIC COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY PROTOCOLS;
COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS;
DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
SEX FACTORS;
SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 33947539420
PISSN: 0732183X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0365 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (4)
|