Statistical methods for comparison of two measuring procedures and for calibration: Analysis of concordance, correlation and regression in the case of measuring intraocular pressure;Statistische verfahren zum vergleich zweier messmethoden und zur kalibrierung: Konkordanz-, korrelations- und regressionsanalyse am beispiel der augeninnendruckmessung

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde

Volumn 224, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 52-57

  Koch, Rainer ^a   Sporl E ^b  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Analysis of regression; Bland Altman plot; Calibration; Concordance; Intraindividual comparison; Intraocular pressure

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOWMETRY; CALIBRATION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EYE BLOOD FLOW; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; ALGORITHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MANOMETRY; METHODOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MANOMETRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 33947533516     PISSN: 00232165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-927278     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Amm M, Hedderich J. Transpalpebrale Tonometrie mit einem digitalen, tragbaren Tonometer in gesunden Augen und nach perforierender Keratoplastik. Ophthalmologe 2005; 102: 70-76
2. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurementt. Lancet 1986; 2: 307-310
3. Carrasco JL, Jover L. Estimating the generalized concordance correlation coefficient through variance components. Biometrics 2003; 59: 849-858
4. Feldmann U, Schneider B. Bivariate structural regression analysis: a tool for the comparison of analytic methods. Methods of Information in Medicine 1987; 26: 205-214
5. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989; 45: 255-268
6. Lin LI, Heydayat AS, Sinha B et al. Statistical methods in assessing agreement: Modell issues and tools. J American Statistical Association 2002; 97: 257-270
7. Morrison D. Scedasticity. In: Armitage P, Colton T (Hrsg). Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1998: 3957-3958
8. Sachs L. Angewandte Statistik. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2002: 407-409, 472, 494-495
9. Sandner D, Böhm A, Kostov S et al. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 243: 563-569
10. Schach S, Schäfer T. Regressions- und Varianzanalyse. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1978: 105-110, 152-169
11. Shoukri MM. Agreement, Measurement of. In: Armitage P, Colton T (Hrsg). Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1998: 103-117
12. Shoukri MM, Pause CA. Statistical methods for health sciences. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1998: 35-41
13. St-Pierre NR. Validating mathematical models of biological systems: application of the concordance correlation coefficient. In: Hanson KM, Hemez FM (Hrsg). Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output. Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2005: 341-350