Origins of individual differences in imitation: Links with language, pretend play, and socially insightful behavior in two-year-old twins

Child Development

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 474-492

  McEwen, Fiona ^a   Happé, Francesca ^a   Bolton, Patrick ^a   Rijsdijk, Fruhling ^a   Ronald, Angelica ^a   Dworzynski, Katharina ^b   Plomin, Robert ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CHILD PARENT RELATION; DIZYGOTIC TWINS; FANTASY; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; GENETICS; HUMAN; IMITATION; INDIVIDUALITY; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MONOZYGOTIC TWINS; PERSONAL CONSTRUCT THEORY; PHENOTYPE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECREATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIALIZATION; STATISTICS; TWINS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AWARENESS; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FANTASY; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; INDIVIDUALITY; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; PARENTING; PERSONAL CONSTRUCT THEORY; PHENOTYPE; PLAY AND PLAYTHINGS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIALIZATION; STATISTICS; TWINS; TWINS, DIZYGOTIC; TWINS, MONOZYGOTIC; VOCABULARY;

EID: 33947528238     PISSN: 00093920     EISSN: 14678624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01010.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Asbury, K., Dunn, J. F., Pike, A., & Plomin, R. (2003). Nonshared environmental influences on individual differences in early behavioral development: A monozygotic twin differences study. Child Development, 74, 933-943.
2. Baldwin, D. A. (2000). Interpersonal understanding fuels knowledge acquisition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 40-45.
3. Benyamin, B., Wilson, V., Whalley, L. J., Visscher, P. M., & Deary, I. J. (2005). Large, consistent estimates of the heritability of cognitive ability in two entire populations of 11-year-old twins from Scottish mental surveys of 1932 and 1947. Behavior Genetics, 35, 525-534.
4. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.
5. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (Revised ed.). New York: Academic Press.
6. Courage, M. L., & Howe, M. L. (2002). From infant to child: The dynamics of cognitive change in the second year of life. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 250-277.
7. Cronk, N. J., Slutske, W. S., Madden, P. A., Bucholz, K. K., Reich, W., & Heath, A. C. (2002). Emotional and behavioral problems among female twins: An evaluation of the equal environments assumption. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 829-837.
8. Dale, P. S., Simonoff, E., Bishop, D. V., Eley, T. C., Oliver, B., Price, T. S., et al. (1998). Genetic influence on language delay in two-year-old children. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 324-328.
9. Donald, M. (2005). Imitation and Mimesis. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 2, pp. 283-300). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10. Dunn, J. (1999). Mindreading and social relationships. In M. Bennett (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Achievements and prospects (pp. 55-71). New York: Psychology Press.
11. Emde, R. N., Plomin, R., Robinson, J. A., Corley, R., DeFries, J., Fulker, D. W., et al. (1992). Temperament, emotion, and cognition at fourteen months: The MacArthur Longitudinal Twin Study. Child Development, 63, 1437-1455.
12. Fenstermacher, S. K., & Saudino, K. J. (2005). Investigating individual differences in imitative performance at age two: A twin study [Abstract]. Behavior Genetics, 35, 800.
13. Forman, D. R., Aksan, N., & Kochanska, G. (2004). Toddlers' responsive imitation predicts preschool-age conscience. Psychological Science, 15, 699-704.
14. Forman, D. R., & Kochanska, G. (2001). Viewing imitation as child responsiveness: A link between teaching and discipline domains of socialization. Developmental Psychology, 37, 198-206.
15. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation by association. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 1, pp. 157-176). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
17. Hughes, C., Jaffee, S. R., Happé, F., Taylor, A., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2005). Origins of individual differences in theory of mind: From nature to nurture? Child Development, 76, 356-370.
18. Irwin, J. R., Carter, A. S., & Briggs-Gowan, M. J. (2002). The social-emotional development of "late-talking" toddlers. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 1324-1332.
19. Kinsbourne, M. (2005). Imitation as entrainment: Brain mechanisms and social consequences. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 2, pp. 163-172). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20. Kremen, W. S., Jacobson, K. C., Xian, H., Eisen, S. A., Waterman, B., Toomey, R., et al. (2005). Heritability of word recognition in middle-aged men varies as a function of parental education. Behavior Genetics, 35, 417-433.
21. LeDoux, J. E. (1998). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. London: Phoenix.
22. Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of "Theory of Mind". Psychological Review, 94, 412-426.
23. Loehlin, J. C. (1996). The Cholesky approach: A cautionary note. Behavior Genetics, 26, 65-69.
24. Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2004). An empirical comparison of information-theoretic selection criteria for multivariate behavior genetic models. Behavior Genetics, 34, 593-610.
25. Masur, E. F. (1995). Infants' early verbal imitation and their later lexical development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41, 286-306.
26. Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Wainwright, R., Das, G. M., Fradley, E., & Tuckey, M. (2002). Maternal mindmindedness and attachment security as predictors of theory of mind understanding. Child Development, 73, 1715-1726.
27. Meltzoff, A., & Gopnik, A. (1993). The role of imitation in understanding persons and developing a theory of mind. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp. 335-366). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28. Meltzoff, A. N. (1999). Origins of theory of mind, cognition and communication. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32, 251-269.
29. Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). Imitation and other minds: The "Like Me" hypothesis. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 2, pp. 55-77). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
30. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (2002). Imitation, memory, and the representation of persons. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 61.
31. Morales, M., Mundy, P., & Rojas, J. (1998). Following the direction of gaze and language development in 6-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 373-377.
32. Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2003). Mx: Statistical modeling (6th ed.). Richmond, VA: Department of Psychiatry.
33. Neale, M C., & Maes, H. H. M. (2003). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Nielson, M., & Dissanayake, C. (2004). Pretend play, mirror self-recognition and imitation: A longitudinal investigation through the second year. Infant Behavior and Development, 27, 342-365.
35. Plomin, R., Willerman, L., & Loehlin, J. C. (1976). Resemblance in appearance and the equal environments assumption in twin studies of personality traits. Behavior Genetics, 6, 43-52.
36. Posthuma, D., & Boomsma, D. I. (2000). A note on the statistical power in extended twin designs. Behavior Genetics, 30, 147-158.
37. Price, T. S., Freeman, B., Craig, I., Petrill, S. A., Ebersole, L., & Plomin, R. (2000a). Infant zygosity can be assigned by parental report questionnaire data. Twin Research, 3, 129-133.
38. Price, T. S., Eley, T. C., Dale, P. S., Stevenson, J., Saudino, K., & Plomin, R. (2000b). Genetic and environmental covariation between verbal and nonverbal cognitive development in infancy. Child Development, 71, 948-959.
39. Purcell, S. (2001). Statistical methods in behavioural genetics. In R. Plomin, J. C. DeFries, G. E. McClearn, & P. McGuffin (Eds.), Behavioral genetics (4th ed., pp. 327-371). New York: Worth.
40. Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111-163.
41. Rakoczy, H., Tomasello, M., & Striano, T. (2005). On tools and toys: How children learn to act on and pretend with 'virgin objects'. Developmental Science, 8, 57-73.
42. Rietveld, M. J., Posthuma, D., Dolan, C. V., & Boomsma, D. L. (2003). ADHD: Sibling interaction or dominance: An evaluation of statistical power. Behavior Genetics, 33, 247-255.
43. Rogers, S. J. (1999). An examination of the imitation deficit in autism. In J. Nadel & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Imitation in infancy (pp. 254-283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44. Rogers, S. J., Hepburn, S. L., Stackhouse, T., & Wehner, E. (2003). Imitation performance in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 763-781.
45. Ronald, A., Happé, F., Hughes, C., & Plomin, R. (2005). Nice and nasty theory of mind in preschool children: Nature and nurture. Social Development, 14, 664-684.
46. Rutter, M. (2006). Genes and behavior: Nature-nurture interplay explained. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
47. Saudino, K. J., Dale, P. S., Oliver, B., Petrill, S. A., Richardson, V., Rutter, M., et al. (1998). The validity of parent-based assessment of the cognitive abilities of 2-year-olds. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 349-363.
48. Slaughter, V., & McConnell, D. (2003). Emergence of joint attention: Relationships between gaze following, social referencing, imitation, and naming in infancy. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164, 54-71.
49. Smith, I. M., & Bryson, S. E. (1994). Imitation and action in autism: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 259-273.
50. Spinath, F. M., Ronald, A., Harlaar, N., Price, T. S., & Plomin, R. (2003). Phenotypic g early in life: On the etiology of general cognitive ability in a large population sample of twin children aged 2-4 years. Intelligence, 31, 2003-2210.
51. Stone, W. L., Ousley, O. Y., & Littleford, C. D. (1997). Motor imitation in young children with autism: What's the object? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25, 475-485.
52. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Trouton, A., Spinath, F. M., & Plomin, R. (2002). Twins early development study (TEDS): A multivariate, longitudinal genetic investigation of language, cognition and behavior problems in childhood. Twin Research, 5, 444-448.
54. Van Baaren, R., & Chartrand, T. L. (2005). Nonconscious imitation has consequences that go beyond the dyad. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts, SSAISB 2005 Convention.
55. Visscher, P. M. (2004). Power of the classical twin design revisited. Twin Research, 7, 505-512.
56. Wadsworth, S. J., Corley, R. P., Hewitt, J. K., & Defries, J. C. (2001). Stability of genetic and environmental influences on reading performance at 7, 12, and 16 years of age in the Colorado Adoption Project. Behavior Genetics, 31, 353-359.
57. Whiten, A., Horner, V., & Marshall-Pescini, S. (2005). Selective imitation in child and chimpanzee: A window on the construal of others' actions. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 1, pp. 263-283). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
58. Williams, J. H., Whiten, A., & Singh, T. (2004). A systematic review of action imitation in autistic spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 285-299.