Lead removal through biological sulfate reduction process

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 98, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 2538-2548

  Hien Hoa, Tran Thi ^a   Liamleam, Warounsak ^a   Annachhatre, Ajit P ^a  

^a ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

COD:S ratio; Electron flow; Lead sulfide precipitation; Sulfate reduction; UASB process

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; BIOREACTORS; ELECTRONS; LEAD; PH EFFECTS; PRECIPITATION (CHEMICAL);

ELECTRON FLOW; LEAD SULFIDE PRECIPITATION; SULFATE REDUCTION;

EFFLUENT TREATMENT;

ALCOHOL; LEAD; LEAD SULFIDE; SULFATE;

BACTERIA; BIOREACTORS; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; ELECTRONS; LEAD; PH EFFECTS; PRECIPITATION (CHEMICAL);

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; ELECTRON; ETHANOL; LEAD; PRECIPITATION (CHEMISTRY); REDUCTION; SULFATE; SULFATE-REDUCING BACTERIUM; WASTE TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFLUENT; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; HEAVY METAL REMOVAL; NONHUMAN; PRECIPITATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; REDUCTION; SULFATE REDUCING BACTERIUM; UPFLOW REACTOR;

HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LEAD; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; PRECIPITATION; SULFATES;

EID: 33947512418     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.060     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Annachhatre A.P., and Suktrakoolvait S. Biological sulfate reduction using molasses as a carbon source. Water Environ. Res. 73 (2001) 118-126
2. APHA, AWWA, WPCF, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. APHA, Washington, DC.
3. Choi E., and Rim J.M. Competition and inhibition of sulfate reducers and methane producers in anaerobic treatment. Water Sci. Techol. 23 (1991) 1259-1264
4. Eckenfelder W.W. Industrial Water Pollution Control. Third ed. (2000), McGraw-Hill, Singapore
5. Fang H.H.P., Liu Y., and Chen T. Effect of sulfate on anaerobic degradation of benzoate in UASB reactors. J. Environ. Eng. 123 (1997) 320-328
6. Gin Y.H.K., Tang Y.Z., and Aziz M.A. Derivation and application of a new model for heavy metal biosorption by Algae. Water Res. 36 (2002) 1313-1323
7. Gray N.F. Water Technology, An Introduction for Environmental Scientists and Engineers (1999), John Wiley and Sons, New York
8. Henze M., and Harremoes P. Anaerobic treatment of wastewater in fixed film reactors, A literature review. Water Sci. Techol. 15 (1982) 1-101
9. Isa Z., Grusenmeyer S., and Verstraete W. Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high-rate anaerobic digestion: technical aspects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51 (1986) 572-579
10. Isa Z., Grusenmeyer S., and Verstraete W. Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high-rate anaerobic digestion: microbiological aspects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51 (1986) 580-587
11. Lettinga G., van Velsen A.F.M., Hobma S.W., de Zeew W.J., and Klapwijk A. Use of the upflow sludge blanket (UASB) reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment. Biotech. Bioeng. 22 (1980) 699-734
12. Lettinga G., Hobma S.W., Hulshoff Pol L.W., de Zeew W.J., De Jong P., Grin P., and Roersma R. Design, operation and economy of anaerobic treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 15 (1983) 177-195
13. Li Y.Y., Lam S., and Fang H.H.P. Interactions between methanogenic, sulfate-reducing and syntrophic acetogenic bacteria in the anaerobic degradation of benzoate. Water Res. 30 (1996) 1555-1562
14. Mizuno O., Li Y.Y., and Noike T. Effects of sulfate concentration and sludge retention time on the interaction between methane production and sulfate reduction for butyrate. Water Sci. Technol. 30 (1994) 45-54
15. Omil F., Lens P., Hulshoff Pol L., and Lettinga G. Effect of upward velocity and sulphide concentration on volatile fatty acid degradation in a sulphidogenic granular sludge reactor. Process Biochem. 31 (1996) 699-710
16. Omil F., Lens P., Visser A., Hulshoff Pol L.W., and Lettinga G. Long-term competition between sulfate reducing and methanogenic bacteria in UASB reactors treating volatile fatty acids. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 57 (1998) 676-685
17. Polprasert C., and Haass C.N. Effect of sulfate on anaerobic processes fed with dual substrates. Water Sci. Technol. 31 (1995) 101-107
18. Suktrakoolvait, S., 2000. Biological sulfate removal using molasses as an electron donor and carbon source. AIT Dissertation no. EV-00-1, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok.
19. Savvides C., Papadopoulos A., Haralambous K.J., and Loizidou M. Sea sediments contaminated with heavy metals: metal speciation and removal. Water Sci. Technol. 32 (1996) 65-73
20. Shin H.S., and Bae B.U. Competition between SRB and MPB according to temperature change in the anaerobic treatment of tannery wastes containing high sulfate. Environ. Technol. 17 (1996) 361-370
21. 2-) concentration for optimal zinc removal by sulfide precipitation in a continuously stirred tank reactor. Water Res. 37 (2003) 3709-3717
22. Vela F.J., Zaiat M., and Foresti E. Influence of the COD to sulphate ratio on the anaerobic organic matter degradation kinetics. Water SA. 28 (2002) 213-216
23. Visser A., Gao Y., and Lettinga G. Effects of pH on methanogenesis and sulphate reduction in thermophillic (55 °C) UASB reactors. Biores. Technol. 44 (1993) 113-121
24. Visser A., Alphenaar A., Gao Y., van Rossum G., and Lettinga G. Granulation and immibilization of methanogenic and sulfate-reducing bacteria in high rate anaerobic reactors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotech. 40 (1993) 575-581
25. Visser A., Hulshoff Pol A.W., and Lettinga G. Competition of methenogenic and sulidogenic bacteria. Water Sci. Technol. 33 (1996) 99-110
26. Walton P.H. Methods of Metal Capture form Effluent, Chemistry of Waste Minimization (1995), Blackie Academic and Professional, New York
27. Yoda M., Kitagawa M., and Miyaji Y. Long term competition between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria for acetate in anaerobic biofilm. Water Res. 21 (1987) 1547