How to say goodbye to the third man

Nous

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 165-202

  Pelletier, Francis Jeffry ^a   Zalta, Edward N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947510724     PISSN: 00294624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0029-4624.00207     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ackrill, J., 1957, 'Plato and the Copula: Sophist 251-259', Journal of Hellenic Studies, 77: 1-6;
2. G. Vlastos (ed.), Plato I: Metaphysics and Epistemology, Garden City, NX: Anchor Books, pp. 210-222.
3. Allen, R. E., 1960, 'Participation and Predication in Plato's Middle Dialogues', Philosophical Review 69: 147-164.
4. Bestor, T., 1980, 'Plato's Semantics and Plato's Parmenides', Phronesis 25: 38-75.
5. Bostock, D., 1984, 'Plato on "is not'", Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 89-119.
6. Cherniss, H., 1957, 'The Relation of the Timaeus to Plato's Later Dialogues', American Journal of Philology 78: 225-266.
7. Clark, R., 1978, 'Not Every Object of Thought Has Being: A Paradox in Naive Predication Theory', Noûs 12: 181-188.
8. Cohen, S. M., 1971, 'The Logic of the Third Man', Philosophical Review 80: 448-475.
9. Durrant, M., 1997, 'Meinwald's Pros Heauto Analysis of Plato's Apparently Self-Predicational Sentences', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75/3 (September): 383-395.
10. Frances, B., 1996, 'Plato's Response to the Third Man Argument in the Paradoxical Exercise of the Pannenides', Ancient Philosophy, 16: 47-64.
11. Frede, M., 1992, 'The Sophist on False Statements', in The Cambridge Companion to Plato, R. Kraut (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 397-424.
12. Frede, M., 1967, Prädikation und Existenzaussage, Hypomnemata 18, Görtingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
13. Hunt, D., 1997, 'How (not) to Exempt Platonic Forms from Pannenides's Third Man', Phronesis 42/1: 1-20.
14. Lewis, F, 1991, Substance and Predication in Aristotle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Lorenz, K., and Mittelstrass, J., 1966, 'Theaitetos Fliegt', Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 48: 113-152.
16. Matthen, M., 1983, 'Greek Ontology and the 'Is' of Truth', Phronesis 28: 113-135.
17. Matthews, G., 1982, 'Accidental Unities', in Language and Logos, M. Nussbaum and M. Schofield (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223-240.
18. Meinwald, C., 1992, 'Good-bye to the Third Man', in The Cambridge Companion to Plato, R. Kraut (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 365-396.
19. Meinwald, C., 1991, Plato's Parmenides, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Moravcsik, X, 1963, 'The "Third Man" Argument and Plato's Theory of Forms', Phronesis 8: 50-62.
21. Nehamas, A., 1982, 'Participation and Predication in Plato's Later Thought', Review of Metaphysics 36: 343-374.
22. Nehamas, A., 1978, 'Self-predication and Plato's Theory of Forms', American Philosophical Quarterly, 16: 93-103.
23. O'Leary-Hawthorne, D., 1996, 'Not Being and Linguistic Deception', in Dialogues with Plato, E. Benitez (ed.), Edmonton: Academic Printing & Publishing, pp. 165-198.
24. Owen, G., 1968, 'Dialectic and Eristic in the Treatment of the Forms', in G. Owen (ed.), Aristotle on Dialectic, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 103-125.
25. Owen, G., 1966, 'The Platonism of Aristotle', Proceedings of the British Academy 51: 125-150.
26. Parsons, T., 1980, Nonexistent Objects, New Haven: Yale University Press.
27. Pelletier, F. X, 1990, Parmenides, Plato, and The Semantics of Not-Being, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
28. Peterson, S., 1996, 'Plato's Parmenides: A Principle of Interpretation and Seven Arguments', Journal of the History of Philosophy, 34: 167-192.
29. Peterson, S., 1973, 'A Reasonable Self-Predication Premise for the Third Man Argument', Philosophical Review 82: 451-470;
30. 'A Correction to "A Reasonable Self-Predication Premise for the Third Man Argument"', Philosophical Review 84 (1975): 96.
31. Rapaport, W., 1978, 'Meinongian Theories and a Russellian Paradox', Noûs 12: 153-180.
32. Sayre, K., 1994, 'Review of Meinwald 1991', Noûs 28: 114-116.
33. Sayre, K., 1983, Plato's Late Ontology: A Riddle Resolved, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34. Shiner, R., 1970, 'Self-Predication and the "Third-Man" Argument', Journal of the History of Philosophy 8: 371-386.
35. Strang, C., 1963, 'Plato and the Third Man', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 37: 147-164.
36. van Fraassen, B., 1969, 'Logical Structure in Plato's Sophist', Review of Metaphysics, 22: 482-498.
37. Vlastos, G., 1973, 'An Ambiguity in the Sophist', in Platonic Studies, G. Vlastos (ed.), Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 270-322.
38. Vlastos, G., 1972, 'The Unity of the Virtues in the Protagoras', Review of Metaphysics 25: 415-458;
39. G. Vlastos (ed.), Platonic Studies, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 221-269.
40. Vlastos, G., 1969, 'Plato's "Third-Man" Argument (Parm. 132a1-b2): Text and Logic', Philosophical Quarterly 19: 289-301.
41. Vlastos, G., 1954, 'The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides', Philosophical Review 63: 319-349.
42. Zalta, E., 1997, 'The Modal Object Calculus and its Interpretation', in Advances in Intensional Logic, M. de Rijke (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997, pp. 249-279.
43. Zalta, E., 1988, Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
44. Zalta, E., 1983, Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.