Biomechanical consequences of variations in artificial disc positioning. A finite element study on the lumbar spine;Biomechanische konsequenzen von verschiedenen positionierungen bewegungserhaltender bandscheibenimplantate. Eine finite-elemente-studie an der lendenwirbelsäule

Orthopade

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 205-211

  Zander, T ^a   Rohlmann, A ^a   Bock, B ^a   Bergmann, G ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artificial disc; Biomechanics; Finite elements; Kinematics; Lumbar spine

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK PROSTHESIS; KINEMATICS; LUMBAR SPINE; MATERIALS TESTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; POSITION; PROSTHESIS; SPINE SURGERY; VALIDATION STUDY;

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 33947505872     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1056-9     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H (2005) Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 18: 40-47
2. Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J et al. (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15: 415-422
3. Heuer F, Schmidt H, Klezl Z et al. (2007) Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase range of motion and change lordosis angle. J Biomech 40(2): 271-280
4. Heuer F, Schmidt H, Klezl Z et al. (2007) Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase vertebral translation and intradiscal pressure. J Biomech 40(4): 795-803
5. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Wright TM (2003) The implications of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16: 412-417
6. Masharawi Y, Rothschild B, Dar G et al. (2004) Facet orientation in the thoracolumbar spine: three-dimensional anatomic and biomechanical analysis. Spine 29: 1755-1763
7. Masharawi Y, Rothschild B, Salame K et al. (2005) Facet tropism and interfacet shape in the thoracolumbar vertebrae: characterization and biomechanical interpretation. Spine 30: E281-E292
8. Panjabi MM, Goel V, Oxland T et al. (1992) Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 17: 299-306
9. Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Meade KP et al. (1999) A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. Spine 24: 1003-1009
10. Rohlmann A, Neller S, Claes L et al. (2001) Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine 26: E557-E561
11. Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G (2006) Spinal loads after osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Eur Spine J 15: 1255-1264
12. Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bock B, Bergmann G (2007) Effect of position and height of a mobile core type artificial disc on the mechanical behaviour of the lumbar spine. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] (submitted)
13. Zander T, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G (2006) Comparison of conventional and kinematic modelling of an artificial disc. In 7th international symposium on computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Antibes, France
14. Zander T, Rohlmann A, Calisse J, Bergmann G (2001) Estimation of muscle forces in the lumbar spine during upper-body inclination. Clin Biomech 16: S73-S80