|
Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 147-148
|
Comparison of the quality of life after minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized study
|
Author keywords
Cholecystectomy; Minilaparotomy; Quality of life
|
Indexed keywords
AGE;
BODY MASS;
CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONFERENCE PAPER;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CONVALESCENCE;
ECHOGRAPHY;
EMOTIONALITY;
FITNESS;
GALLSTONE;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HEALTH STATUS;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
LAPAROTOMY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MEDICAL ASSESSMENT;
OPERATION DURATION;
PAIN ASSESSMENT;
PHYSICAL CAPACITY;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SEX DIFFERENCE;
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;
SOCIAL STATUS;
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;
SURGEON;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC;
FEMALE;
GALLSTONES;
HUMANS;
LAPAROTOMY;
MALE;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 33947504409
PISSN: 15651088
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Conference Paper |
Times cited : (27)
|
References (6)
|