Spatial integration with rats

Learning and Behavior

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 348-354

  Chamizo, V D ^a   Rodrigo, T ^a   Mackintosh, N J ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c University of Cambridge   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ESCAPE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; LATENT PERIOD; LIGHT DARK CYCLE; MALE; NONHUMAN; RAT; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TRAINING; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; LONG EVANS RAT;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; FEMALE; MALE; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 33947499102     PISSN: 15434494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193198     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. ADAMS, C. D., & DICKINSON, A. (1981a). Actions and habits: Variations in associative representations during instrumental learning. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 143-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. ADAMS, C. D., & DICKINSON, A. (1981b). Instrumental responding following reinforcer devaluation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33B, 109-121.
3. BLAISDELL, A. P., & COOK, R. G. (2005). Integration of spatial maps in pigeons. Animal Cognition, 8, 7-16.
4. BROGDEN, W. J. (1939). Sensory pre-conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 323-332.
5. CHAMIZO, V. D., MANTEIGA, R. D., RODRIGO, T., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (2006). Competition between landmarks in spatial learning: The role of proximity to the goal. Behavioural Processes, 71, 59-65.
6. GALLISTEL, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. MORRIS, R. G. M. (1981). Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. Learning & Motivation, 12, 239-260.
8. PEARCE, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
9. POUCET, B. (1993). Spatial cognitive maps in animals: New hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychological Review, 100, 163-182.
10. RAZRAN, G. (1961). The observable unconscious and the inferable conscious in current Soviet psychophysiology: Interoceptive conditioning, semantic conditioning, and the orienting reflex. Psychological Review, 68, 81-147.
11. SAWA, K., LEISING, K. J., & BLAISDELL, A. P. (2005). Sensory preconditioning in spatial learning using a touch screen task in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 368-375.
12. SPETCH, M. L. (1995). Overshadowing in landmark learning: Touchscreen studies with pigeons and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 166-181.
13. SUTHERLAND, R. J., CHEW, G. L., BAKER, J. C., & LINGGARD, R. C. (1987). Some limitations on the use of distal cues in place navigation by rats. Psychobiology, 15, 48-57.
14. WORDEN, R. (1992). Navigation by fragment fitting: A theory of hippocampal function. Hippocampus, 2, 165-187.