Ultrasound assessment of placenta previa »migration« in relationship to maternal demographic factors

Gynaecologia et Perinatologia

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 9-13

  Predanić, Mladen ^a   Perni, Sriram C ^b   Baergen, Rebecca N ^c   Chasen, Steven T ^c  

^a JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b ST ELIZABETH HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^c WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Delivery; Migration; Parity; Placenta previa; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; PARITY; PLACENTA LOCALIZATION; PLACENTA PREVIA; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREVALENCE; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY;

EID: 33947432799     PISSN: 13300091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Love CD, Wallace EM. Pregnancies complicated by placenta previa: What is appropriate management? Br J Obstet Gynecol 1996;103:864-7.
2. Zhang J, Savitz DA. Maternal age and placenta previa: a population-based, case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168:641-5.
3. Williams MA, Mittendorf R. Increasing maternal age as a determinant of placenta previa. More important than increasing parity? J Reprod Med 1993;38:425-8.
4. Ananth CV, Wilcox AJ, Savitz DA, Bowes WA Jr, Luther ER. Effect of maternal age and parity on the risk of uteroplacental bleeding disorders in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:511-6.
5. Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:976-80.
6. McMahon MJ, Li R, Schenck AP, Olshan AF, Royce RA. Previous cesarean birth. A risk factor for placenta previa? J Reprod Med 1997;42:409-12.
7. Laughon SK, Wolfe HM, Visco AG. Prior cesarean and the risk for placenta previa on second-trimester ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:962-5.
8. Taylor VM, Kramer MD, Vaughan TL, Peacock S. Placenta previa and prior cesarean delivery: how strong is the association? Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:55-7.
9. th Edition). Philadelphia (USA): Saunders, Elsevier Inc 2004;707-22.
10. Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Ramus RM, Santos-Ramos R, Twickler DM. Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99: 692-7.
11. Anonymous. Anatomy and pathology of the umbilical cord and major fetal vessels: length of the cord. In: Benirschke K, Kaufmann P. The pathology of the human placenta. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2000: 348-53.
12. King DL. Placental migration demonstrated by ultrasonography: a hypothesis of dynamic placentation. Radiology 1973; 109:167-70.
13. Predanic M, Perni SC, Baergen RN, Jean-Pierre C, Chasen ST, Chervenak FA. A sonographic assessment of different patterns of placenta previa »migration« in the third trimester of pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:773-80.
14. Oppenheimer L, Holmes P, Simpson N, Dabrowski A. Diagnosis of low-lying placenta: can migration in the third trimester predict outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18: 100-2.
15. Kurjak A, Barsic E. Changes of placental site diagnosed by repeated ultrasonic examination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1977;56:161-5.
16. Timor-Trisch IE, Monteagudo A. Diagnosis of placenta previa by transvaginal sonography. Ann Med 1993;25:279-83.
17. Townsend RP, Laing FC, Nyberg DA. Technical factors responsible for »placental migration:« sonographic assessment. Radiology 1986;160:105-8.
18. Ghourab S, Al-Jabari A. Placental migration and mode of delivery in placenta previa: transvaginal sonographic assessment during the third trimester. Ann Saudi Med 2000;20:382-5.